Answer:
Company HD pays less in taxes
Explanation:
In the case when the company HD and LD have the similar rate of tax, sales revenue, etc even both have favorable net incomes also the company Hd contains greater debt ratio due to which it has more interest expense so that means company hd would pay less taxes
Therefore the above represent the answer
and, this is the answer but the same is not provided in the given options
Answer: A. As Expenses
B. No treatment.
Explanation:
A. The $100,000 was not structured and a loan so it will be accounted for as EXPENSES. This means that it will be deducted from the Income for the year from Calhoun's books.
B. A C Corporation is by definition taxed SEPARATELY from it's owners in the United States of America. Seeing as both Corporations were C Corporations, Jonathan as the owner of both companies need not worry about how he should treat the $100,000 payment as he will not ne taxed on it.
Answer:
You forgot to add the screen shot!
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Answer:
D) As a disclosure only. No liability is reported
Explanation:
US GAAP requires that probable contingent liabilities (like lawsuits) are disclosed in the footnotes of the financial statements. If it is probable that the liability will exist, in this case that Hillsborough will lose the case, then they must record the contingent liability at its most reasonable amount. If the amount cannot be estimated, then they must record it at its lowest amount. The key word is "probable", since it must be likely that the event occurs in order for it to be recorded in the footnotes.
