1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fittoniya [83]
3 years ago
14

Weber used the term verstehen to analyze social behavior. He believed that to understand behavior we must look at how other peop

le view and explain their own behavior from a(n) ______ perspective.
Social Studies
1 answer:
bearhunter [10]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Subjunctive perspective

Explanation:

In simple words, Weber claimed that explaining why people are doing the activities they are doing is the fundamental building stone of psychology, a idea he called Verstehen. He claimed that social scientists should not only research a population of citizens, but also strive to develop an emotionally intelligent appreciation for the persons in that population.

You might be interested in
Which reason best explains why many American Indian chiefdoms came to an end within a few years of Hernando de Soto's arrival in
devlian [24]

Answer:

The answer is A

Explanation:

The Exposure to diseases killed many natives

7 0
3 years ago
Give one short-term consequence and one long-term consequence that resulted from 3rd world countries gaining their independence.
sertanlavr [38]

A short term consequence was poverty and a long term consequence is segregation. The economies are rising after nearly decades of poverty. This might be long term or short term if the economies keep growing.

4 0
3 years ago
What rights does Hobbes believe it is never rational to abandon
Lesechka [4]

Answer:

For many centuries, natural law was recognized as a type of higher law that spelled out universal truths for the moral ordering of society based on a rational understanding of human nature. As a higher moral law, it gave citizens a standard for determining if the written laws and customs of their nation or any other nation were just or unjust, right or wrong, humane or inhumane. Today, natural law is not discussed very much, at least not explicitly. When mentioned at all, it is usually rejected as dangerous because it undermines existing laws or as intolerant because it is contrary to “multiculturalism,” which requires the non-judgmental acceptance of other cultures.

This negative view of natural law can be traced to Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679), whose writings are largely devoted to showing the anarchy and civil wars caused by appeals to natural and divine laws above the will of the sovereign. Hobbes rejected traditional higher law doctrines and encouraged people to accept the established laws and customs of their nations, even if they seemed oppressive, for the sake of civil peace and security. His critique has been a leading cause of the demise of natural law and the acceptance of positive law as the only reliable guide for political authority.

One may be equally surprised to learn, however, that many people today embrace a different (and seemingly contradictory) view of natural law, and this too is traceable to Thomas Hobbes. For example, when conscientious people are confronted with violations of human rights—as in religious theocracies that violate women’s rights or in countries that allow sweatshops to trample on worker’s rights—they feel compelled to protest the injustice of those practices and to change them for the better. The protesters usually deny that they are following natural law, but they obviously are asserting a belief in universal moral truths that are grounded in human nature—in this case, the natural equality of human beings that underlies human rights. This understanding of higher law originates with Hobbes because he was largely responsible for transforming classical natural law into modern natural rights, thereby beginning the “human rights revolution” in thinking on natural law. How is it possible for Hobbes and his followers to embrace seemingly contradictory views of natural law, rejecting one form as intolerant, self-righteous, and anarchical, while embracing another form as the universal ideal of social justice? Let us turn to Hobbes for an answer to this puzzle, and, in so doing, uncover the sources of our modern conceptions of law, rights, and justice.

4 0
4 years ago
PLEASE help me ASAP.
hjlf
1.Adjust your day-to-day behaviors
2.Replace your light bulbs
3.Use smart power strips
4.Install a programmable thermostat
5.Use energy efficient appliances
6.Reduce water heating expenses
7.Install energy efficient windows
8.Upgrade your HVAC system
9.Weatherize your home
10.Insulate your home
3 0
3 years ago
The chinese government revised their nation's history curriculum recently by
zubka84 [21]

The Chinese Government recently revised  their nation's history curriculum by declaring  that the Chinese Communist Party  played a fundamental role in the World War II victory, defeating Japan. It made no mention of the 30 million Chinese who died under the communist  revolutionary Mao Zedong's program known as the Great Leap Forward.

3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Ral has been golfing for most of his life and thinks he's a good golfer. So, Ral was surprised when his friend asked him to desc
    8·1 answer
  • Which is the best definition of hyperinflation?
    7·1 answer
  • Watch CNN News. (March 26 2020). What is the estimated cost of the stimulus plan that passed this week in the U.S. Senate,
    7·1 answer
  • Chapters 14 and 15 describe krakauer's successful attempt when he was 23 years old to climb the "devil's thumb," a mountain in a
    15·1 answer
  • List the reasons the Colonists were dissatisfied with great Britain. (at least 4)
    14·1 answer
  • In addition to pregnant women, fetuses, and neonates, another subpart of the HHS regulations provides additional protections for
    14·1 answer
  • Mga bagay na nasunod nga may pag galang​
    8·1 answer
  • What do you think Laurence Yep’s perspective on what it’s like to fit into another culture might be?
    9·1 answer
  • 17. What evidence does the author of The Roman Republic give to support the claim that the
    6·1 answer
  • are there any redeeming qualities to elitism and any downsides to pluralism? are there any problems with allowing interest group
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!