1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gemiola [76]
3 years ago
5

five years ago, my grandfather was five times as old as I was. Three years from now, my grandfather will be three times as old a

s I will be. how old am I now?
Chemistry
2 answers:
lakkis [162]3 years ago
7 0
You never told us how old you are so how are we supposed to answer
Musya8 [376]3 years ago
6 0
You're 13 now. you were 8 five years ago while ur grandfather was 40(40/5=8) 8yrs from then, which is three years from now, ur 16 while ur grandfather is 48 (48/3=16) minus the three years to today 16-3=13. You are 13 yrs old.
You might be interested in
Mg+2N=??<br>complete and balance it​
shtirl [24]

Answer:

mg3n2

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How many moles of calcium chloride are contained in a 333 gram sample?
Bogdan [553]

Answer & Explanation:

The molar mass of calcium chloride is 110.98 g/mol. We can use this information to solve this problem. We can set up our equation like this..

\frac{333 g(CaCl2)}{} *\frac{1mol(CaCl2)}{110.98g(CaCl2)}

Multiply straight across on the top and straight across on the bottom.

\frac{333}{110.98}

Now divide.

\frac{333}{110.98}=3.00

So, there are 3.00 moles of calcium chloride contained in a 33 gram sample which is answer choice D.

6 0
3 years ago
What is the molarity of a solution in which 58g of nacl are dissolved in 1.0l of solution?
Marat540 [252]
Molarity is moles of solute per liter of solvent, so convert 58 g NaCl to moles, then divide by 1 liter to get your answer
7 0
3 years ago
HELP PLSSS FASTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Elza [17]

Answer:

with what?

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which procedure(s) decrease(s) the random error of a measurement:
PolarNik [594]

Taking the average of more measurements decreases random error of measurement

Taking the average of many measurements is the most effective way to reduce random errors in a measurement. Because the certainty of the results grows as the number of data does, Less risk of random errors means that the value is more certain. Fewer measurements lead to less reliable data collection, which raises the likelihood of random errors.

The complete question is

Which procedure(s) decrease(s) the random error of a measurement: (1) taking the average of more measurements: (2) calibrating the instrument; (3) taking fewer measurements? Explain

To learn more about random errors:

brainly.com/question/14149934

#SPJ4

8 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Consider the lattice energy of any ionic compound. What combination of ions and charges will produce the largest (in magnitude)
    14·1 answer
  • What is the value for the reaction: N2(g) + 2 O2(g) --&gt; N2O4(g) in terms of K values from the reactions:
    12·1 answer
  • Aluminum hydroxide + nitric acid ➡ aluminum nitrate + water
    11·1 answer
  • The density of aluminum is 2.70 g/cm'. If the volume of a piece of aluminum is 90.4 cm', what is
    13·1 answer
  • C-12 and C-13 are naturally-occurring isotopes of the element carbon. C-12 occurs 98.88% of the time and C-13 occurs 1.108% of t
    8·1 answer
  • Is this right?????????????????????
    12·1 answer
  • What is the total number of joules released when a 5.00-gram sample of water changes from liquid to solid at 0°C?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of these is a covalent compound?
    12·2 answers
  • Do carbon has ions charge?​
    11·1 answer
  • according to iupac nomeclature rules which set of chemical name and formula for the same compound is correct?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!