In relation to market sizing, matters tend to be a bit simpler for b2b sellers as compared to b2c dealers.
The "marketplace sizing" is made from the entire wide variety of capacity shoppers of a service or product inside a given market, and the entire revenue that these sales might also generate. it's crucial to calculate and understand marketplace size for several reasons.
Market sizing research affords insights into market funding decisions and ambitions to discover the ability of a marketplace in terms of length and profitability.
Everyday market length (NMS) is the minimum range of stocks that market makers ought to deal with in a transaction for that specific stock at a specific charge. normal market length way that there may be an assured bid and offer in the inventory to maintain expenses and trades flowing.
Learn more about market sizing here: brainly.com/question/13859545
#SPJ4
Answer:
A)equity theory.
Explanation:
From the question, we were informed that, if I'm a manager who made sure that rewards were distributed to my employees fairly based on their performance and that each employee clearly understood the basis for his or her own pay, In this case, I would be using equity theory. Equity theory, which is also known as Adams equity theory explained that a fair balance should exist between the input of an employee and the output, the input in this sense could be employee's skills, hardwork, the output as well could be the salaries, recognition given to employees. It should be noted that Equity theory allows to know how fair is the distribution of resources to relational partners.
Answer and Explanation:
The Journal entry is shown below:-
Bad debts expense Dr, $2,000
To Accounts receivable-Hopkins $2,000
(Being write off is recorded)
Here we debited the bad debt expenses as it increased the expenses and we credited the accounts receivable as it reduced the assets so that the proper posting could be done
Answer:
The answer is: remain the same
Explanation:
The marginal utility of a good or service is how much better we feel when consuming an extra unit of that good or service. For example if we are very thirsty, the marginal utility of consuming a can of Coke is very large, but once our thirst is quenched, an extra can of Coke will not provide use with that much satisfaction as before.
If the price of a substitute good increases, the marginal utility of the good whose price didn't change, will remain the same.
Let's go back to the Coke example. An extra can of Coke will give me 5 more satisfaction units (I'm assuming I can measure satisfaction) and an extra slice of pizza will give me 7 more units of satisfaction. If the price of Coke increases from 50 cents to $1, its marginal utility will decrease. I will buy more pizza because the satisfaction I get from drinking Coke is now smaller.
