Answer:
The Supreme Court decision that decided the 2000 Presidential Election should go down in history as one of the court's most ill-conceived judgments. In issuing its poorly-reasoned ruling in Bush v. Gore, the court majority unnecessarily exposed itself to charges of partisanship and risked undermining the court's stature as an independent, impartial arbiter of the law. Although the court majority correctly identified constitutional problems in the specific recount proceedings ordered by the Florida Supreme Court, the decision to end all recount attempts did immeasurable damage to the equal protection rights the court claimed to be guarding, since it favored a convenient and timely tabulation of ballots over an accurate recording of the vote. In the controversy that followed this decision, some critics of the majority decision argued that the court had no business taking on Bush v. Gore in the first place, that it should have remained solely within the Florida courts (Ginsburg, J. [Dissent] Bush v. Gore [2000]). This paper will argue that the court was correct to intervene but that umm the resulting decision was flawed and inconsistent, with potentially serious, adverse implications for the Federal judiciary if the court continues to issue rulings in this way.
Explanation:
Answer:
hey Jayamashi may God help you in this question sorry I also became confused
The United Kingdom in the Battle of Britain.
Explanation:
Jefferson's belief in the necessity of ending slavery never changed. From the mid-1770s until his death, he advocated the same plan of gradual emancipation. First, the transatlantic slave trade would be abolished.
Answer:
The Colonists mentioned their complaints against king George in Complaints section o the Declaration of Independence. It contained 27 grievances against the action and decisions of King George Third. The grievances are similar to John Lock's works.
Historical documents like Bill of Rights 1689 and Magna Carta had already established the concept that King must not interfere with the rights of people. While in the views of colonists King George had done so by opposing the laws which were important for public good.
<u><em>The declaration had four parts and it was in the third part that the complaints against King George was mentioned.</em></u>
