Answer:
24 a.)
Step-by-step explanation:
the base is a triangle
To determine the amount of gold plating necessary for the similar box, you will use the fact that it is 8 times larger in volume to determine how many times larger the area is. This would be what you will multiply $125 by.
Volume is a three dimensional measurement, so the fact that it is 8 times larger tells us each dimension was 2 times larger (2 x 2 x 2=8).
Area is a two dimensional measurement, so the area would have been 2 x 2 or 4 times larger. This means the price would be 4 times as much.
$125 x 4 = $500.
It will cost $500 to gold plate the similar jewelry box.
In this question, you're solving the inequality for x.
Solve:
-1/3(6x - 15) + 6x > 8x - 11
Distribute the -1/3 to the variables in the parenthesis.
-2x + 5 + 6x > 8x - 11
Combine like terms
4x + 5 > 8x - 11
Subtract 8x from both sides
-4x + 5 > - 11
Subtract 5 from both sides
-4x > -16
Divide both sides by -4, while also flipping the inequality, since you're dividing by a negative.
x < 4
Answer:
x < 4
8675 ÷ .5= 17350
You could also multiply by 2 to check your answer
17350 * .5= 8675
You could also divide by 2.
Answer:
a) Rumble: $1
Pedal: $0.6
b) more than 5 songs
c) No, should be integers only
d) No, has to be integers greater than or equal to 2
Step-by-step explanation:
Part a
Rate per song is the slope.
Rumble:
Slope is 0.6
Rate is $0.6 per song
Pedal:
Slope: (4-2)/(2-0) = 1
Rate is $1 per song
Part b
Pedal would be a better deal if it's cost is lower than Rumble's
Rumble's cost: C = 2 + S
Pedal's cost: C = 4 + 0.6S
4 + 0.6S < 2 + S
0.4S > 2
S > 5
c) No, because no. of songs has to be positive integers only.
For example graph shows S = 2.5, but we know that's not possible
d) No, since the cost is 2 + S,
cost can't be in decimals either.
Cost too should be only integers greater than equal to 2
