May be times of high productivity or
creativity.
Yes, the crime still would have been committed. Falsification of documents and false representations are crimes, irrespective of their consequences.
However. If Mills had paid, Pivowar would never have come to know about the false representation and the case would not have come to court. Whether the case comes to the court or it does not, is an independent factor of whether a crime has been committed.
A crime is an offense punishable by state or other authority. The term crime does not have a simple, generally accepted definition in modern criminal law, but a statutory definition is provided for specific purposes.
Learn more about crime here:brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ4
Answer:
Stewart (1980) Halo Effect.
Explanation:
The halo effect refers to a form of cognitive bias in which our general opinion of an individual determines how we think or feel about their personality. When creating a first impression, noticing an initial desirable characteristic, maybe attractiveness or power may make the individual appealing, making it difficult to revise the impression on the basis of new or opposing details. As per the question, the different analyses of defendants for the same crime is an example of the Halo Effect.
This is true because they wanted better opportunities for farming and to make more money
Answer: I don’t know that why I’m asking
Explanation: sorry this didn’t help