Answer: True
Explanation: Work/family life conflict has been a issue of social debate which usually occurs within families when they find it difficult to find the balance between work and family. It is a socio-economic issue which is likely to persist into the future. With issues such as ; More women in the paid workforce, more dual-income families, more single working parents and so in not likely to recede anytime soon.
The correct option is B
The dissolution of the USSR was a political issue, nor did the economic situation cause a general discontent of the population that continued to prefer the Soviet system. The dissolution of the USSR caused much worse economic problems to the Russian population than the previous decade.
The USSR during the 1980s had tense relations with the USA, while China, which was a country with material conditions objectively much worse than the USSR decided to approach the USA, which allowed them some relief. In any case the Chinese hierarchs did not consider at any moment to realize some type of opening as delayed would try Gorbachov.
Protect and provide
The concept of government as provider comes next: government as provider of goods and services that individuals cannot provide individually for themselves. Government in this conception is the solution to collective action problems, the medium through which citizens create public goods that benefit everyone, but that are also subject to free-rider problems without some collective compulsion.
The basic economic infrastructure of human connectivity falls into this category: the means of physical travel, such as roads, bridges and ports of all kinds, and increasingly the means of virtual travel, such as broadband. All of this infrastructure can be, and typically initially is, provided by private entrepreneurs who see an opportunity to build a road, say, and charge users a toll, but the capital necessary is so great and the public benefit so obvious that ultimately the government takes over.
A more expansive concept of government as provider is the social welfare state: government can cushion the inability of citizens to provide for themselves, particularly in the vulnerable conditions of youth, old age, sickness, disability and unemployment due to economic forces beyond their control. As the welfare state has evolved, its critics have come to see it more as a protector from the harsh results of capitalism, or perhaps as a means of protecting the wealthy from the political rage of the dispossessed. At its best, however, it is providing an infrastructure of care to enable citizens to flourish socially and economically in the same way that an infrastructure of competition does. It provides a social security that enables citizens to create their own economic security.
The future of government builds on these foundations of protecting and providing. Government will continue to protect citizens from violence and from the worst vicissitudes of life. Government will continue to provide public goods, at a level necessary to ensure a globally competitive economy and a well-functioning society. But wherever possible, government should invest in citizen capabilities to enable them to provide for themselves in rapidly and continually changing circumstances.
Not surprisingly, this vision of government as investor comes from a deeply entrepreneurial culture. Technology reporter Gregory Ferenstein has polled leading silicon Valley entrepreneurs and concludedthat they “want the government to be an investor in citizens, rather than as a protector from capitalism. They want the government to heavily fund education, encourage more active citizenship, pursue binding international trade alliances and open borders to all immigrants.” In the words of Alphabet Chairman Eric Schmidt: “The combination of innovation, empowerment and creativity will be our solution.”
This celebration of human capacity is a welcome antidote to widespread pessimism about the capacity of government to meet current national and global economic, security, demographic and environmental challenges. Put into practice, however, government as investor will mean more than simply funding schools and opening borders. If government is to assume that in the main citizens can solve themselves more efficiently and effectively than government can provide for them, it will have to invest not only in the cultivation of citizen capabilities, but also in the provision of the resources and infrastructure to allow citizens to succeed at scale
The superego decides what is good and bad, the ego decides what is possible, and the id decides what would be enjoyable, according to Freud's theory of personality.
<h3><u>What is Freud's personality theory?</u></h3>
Sigmund Freud believed that the human personality was complex and had many facets. The three facets of personality, according to Freud's well-known psychoanalytic theory, are the id, ego, and superego. The combination of these components leads to complex human actions.
Each component offers something distinctly unique to personality, and the way the three work together has a big effect on a person. Each personality trait appears in varying degrees throughout life. The id, according to Freud, is the main element of personality because it is the source of all psychic energy.
According to Freud, the ego emerges from the id and makes sure that the impulses d's can be communicated in a way that is appropriate for the outside world. Freud believed that the superego first appears at about age five.
Learn more about Freud's theory with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/6401105
#SPJ4
