Answer:
honestly i have no idea because thats to much stress to be the presidant
Explanation:
i would take down trumps wall tho :)
Russia’s defeat of France was the pivoting point in the Napoleonic Wars, because right after that Napoleon’s empire turned against him. Thus, the correct answer is A).
The Russian victory over the French army in 1812 was a fiasco for Napoleon's plans to conquer Europe. His army was practically destroyed and the spirits were low for French soldiers trapped in Russia, fighting battles and for the troops on other fronts.
As early as 1920, i believe.
Answer: B is correct.
Explanation: historians who hold there was no holocaust are considered revisionists. Today there is a strong tendency in Ucraine (for example) to rewrite history of the WW II and reject some fundamental thesis infused to its inhabitants to previous Soviet historiography. In France (for example) after the WW II there was a so-called "immunity thesis" (author: René Rémond) according to which French did not have their own sort of fascism but the fascism was imported to France (this thesis started being questioned and rejected by foreign historians Paxton and Sternhell much later). Revisionists are also those who reject using traditional terminology. In Brazil historians traditionally spoke about "discovery of Brazil" (1500), today some of them use word "invasion" or even "genocide". The question is to which degree we project our contemporary situation (political, social) to the past.
I believe it’s D. because you would basically be inclusive with anybody you come across with regardless of what they identify themselves as because it’s simply a language without discrimination.
