Answer:
Correct option is A.
<u>In general, the basis to the recipient is the fair market value at the decedent's date of death.
</u>
Explanation:
If property is inherited by a taxpayer, <u>In general, the basis to the recipient is the fair market value at the decedent's date of death.
</u>
As per the the law when property is transferred on account of death, then basis to the recipient is the fair market value at the time of death of decedent's.
Answer: B. False
Explanation: If you chose a specific career and go for it until the end of high school you’ll probably have more knowledge in it but you can change your career by doing different curriculums during college or in the summer.
Answer:
A. the economy is producing at less than its potential output and has some cyclical unemployment.
Explanation:
Increase in government spending will increase domestic income, only if economy is producing at less than its potential output.
Increase in federal government spending raises the level of 'govt expenditure' in Aggregate Demand. This creates 'Excess Demand' (AD > AS). However, if the economy is at full employment level, i.e all the resources are already best efficiently utilised as per their production potential. Then, the economy can't increase its domestic income more than its full employment (full potential) level. So : Increase in government spending in full employment case, wont increase total production/ income/ employment further ; as the economy is already at full employment & can't increase economic activity beyond that.
Answer:
Have we inventoried the third party relationships that exist in our organization today?
How are we identifying and tracking new or changing relationships?
Have we assessed and prioritized the risks related to those relationships?
When evaluating new relationships, do our selection criteria address risks to the organization?
Where applicable, do our agreements and contracts include adequate terms and conditions to require third-parties to provide independent assurance to mitigate potential risks, convey trust and confidence, and demonstrate compliance with laws and regulations?
Are responsibilities to manage these risks clearly defined individually for each third-party and as a whole?
Are we monitoring the various risks and contract requirements associated with each existing relationship and at what interval?
Are these relationships dependent on subservice organizations?
How do we gain comfort that information provided by third-parties is valid, accurate, and complete?
Does our risk assessment process identify potential negative events resulting from third party relationships and include procedures in place to respond?
A. it makes sence out of all. im trully sorry if its wrong.
