Answer is: excess of hydrazine is 16 grams.
Chemical reaction: N₂O₄(l) + 2N₂H₄(l) → 3N₂(g) + 4H₂<span>O(g).
</span>m(N₂H₄) = 80,1 g.
m(N₂O₄) = 92,0 g.
n(N₂H₄) = m(N₂H₄) ÷ M(N₂H₄).
n(N₂H₄) = 80,1 g ÷ 32 g/mol.
n(N₂H₄) = 2,5 mol.
n(N₂O₄) = 92 g ÷ 92 g/mol.
n(N₂O₄) = 1 mol; limiting reactant.
From chemical reaction: n(N₂H₄) : n(N₂O₄) = 2 : 1.
n(N₂H₄) = 2 mol reacts.
Δn(N₂H₄) = 2,5 mol - 2 mol = 0,5 mol.
Δm(N₂H₄) = 0,5 mol · 32 g/mol = 16 g.
The molar solubility is 7.4×
M and the solubility is 7.4× g/L .
Calculation ,
The dissociation of silver bromide is given as ,
→ 
+ 
S
- S S
Ksp = [ ] [ ] = [S] [ S ] = 
S = √ Ksp = √ 5. 5×
= 7.4×
The solubility =7.4× g/L
The molar solubility is the solubility of one mole of the substance.
Since , one mole of is dissociates and form one mole of each and ion . So, solubility is equal to molar solubility but unit is different.
Molar solubility = 7.4× mol/L = 7.4× M
To learn more about molar solubility ,
brainly.com/question/16243859
#SPJ4
Answer : It is a conclusion.
Explanation:
Conclusion: It is a judgement or decision which can be attained by reasoning.
From the observation table given we can conclude that :
- Aluminum ,bronze and steel took 27,45 and 80 seconds to melt small piece of wax respectively which means that more time will be required by them to transfer heat to the food while cooking. Hence, food will take more time to cook in them.
- Copper took less time of 15 seconds to melt the small piece of wax in comparison to other metal pots which means that it is a good conductor of heat in comparison to other. Hence, copper pot would be better for cooking food quickly.
After analyzing the observations and results in an experiment conclusion was made that copper pots are best for cooking foods.
Zn(s) + 2HCl(aq) = ZnCl₂(aq) + H₂(g)
zinc + hydrochloric acid = zinc chloride + hydrogen
Hope this helps :) I didn’t know how to write subscripts so I wrote it down on some paper.
