we need to see the diagramph
The burden of diseases A and B in country Z is that disease B has a higher prevalence than
disease A. That is option D.
<h3>Health statistics of Country Z</h3>
Health statistics is used by professionals to summarize the health status or information on the health of individuals in a particular geographical location.
The basic statistic tools that can be used to check the health status of a population are,
The prevalence rate is the total number of cases of a disease existing in a population divided by the total population.
The prevalence rate of disease A = 225 per 100,000 population while the prevalence rate of disease B = 500 per 100,000 population.
Therefore, the burden of diseases A and B in country Z is that Disease B has a higher prevalence than
disease A.
Learn more about prevalence here:
brainly.com/question/25151633
Answer:
According to the hormone diagram of the menstrual cycle, the woman is not pregnant due to the behavior of progesterone and estrogens, whose levels do not increase, in addition to the absence of human chorionic gonadotropin.
Explanation:
The graph shows the behavior of hormones during a woman's menstrual cycle in the absence of pregnancy.
During a woman's normal cycle, estrogen, luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) tend to increase prior to ovulation, reach their peak values at ovulation, and then decline, as shown in the graph. Progesterone, on the other hand, increases after ovulation and decreases if the woman does not become pregnant.
In the case of a pregnant woman:
- <u>Estrogens</u> continue to increase after ovulation, produced by the ovaries and placenta.
- <u>Progesterone</u> also increases its levels, as it is a hormone produced by the ovaries and placenta.
- <u>Hormone human chorionic gonadotropin</u> (HCG) appears and increases during pregnancy, due to the secretory activity of the placenta.
<em><u>The diagram represents the normal cycle of a woman who is not pregnant</u></em>.
There are all sorts of ways to reconstruct the history of life on Earth. Pinning down when specific events occurred is often tricky, though. For this, biologists depend mainly on dating the rocks in which fossils are found, and by looking at the “molecular clocks” in the DNA of living organisms.
There are problems with each of these methods. The fossil record is like a movie with most of the frames cut out. Because it is so incomplete, it can be difficult to establish exactly when particular evolutionary changes happened.
Modern genetics allows scientists to measure how different species are from each other at a molecular level, and thus to estimate how much time has passed since a single lineage split into different species. Confounding factors rack up for species that are very distantly related, making the earlier dates more uncertain.
These difficulties mean that the dates in the timeline should be taken as approximate. As a general rule, they become more uncertain the further back along the geological timescale we look. Dates that are very uncertain are marked with a question mark.
