Simplify 16^-4 by making the exponent positive

1 answer:

8 0

Whenever we have a negative exponent, that means that the function should be in the denomenator. then the exponent will be positive.

Example

16^-4 = 1/(16^4)

You might be interested in

Drag all of the division problems that have an estimated quotient of 12 into the box.

Mars2501 [29]

Answer:
Option 5 & 6

Step by Step Explanation:
8 / 0.95 = 8.4 ( wrong )
18 / 2.2 = 8.18 ( wrong )
47.6 / 3.9 = 16.41 ( wrong )
10.6 / 1.89 = 5.6 ( wrong )
71.9 / 6.5 = 11.061 ( correct )
123.4 / 9.2 = 13.41 ( correct )
157.4 / 16.4 = 9.59 ( wrong )

hope this helps! please give brainliest and thanks!!!

4 0

3 years ago

Ex 7) Imagine a mile-long bar of metal such as the rail along railroad tracks. Suppose that the rail is anchored on both ends an

Fantom [35]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

about 44.5 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

We can write relations for the height of the rail as a function of initial length and expanded length, but the solution cannot be found algebraically. A graphical solution or iterative solution is possible.

Referring to the figure in the second attachment, we can write a relation between the angle value α and the height of the circular arc as ...

h = c·tan(α) . . . . . . where c = half the initial rail length

Then the length of the expanded rail is ...

s = r(2α) = (c/sin(2α)(2α) . . . . . . where s = half the expanded rail length

Rearranging this last equation, we have ...

sin(2α)/(2α) = c/s

It is this equation that must be solved iteratively. We find the solution to be ...

α ≈ 0.0168538794049 radians

So, the height of the circular arc is ...

h = 2640.5·tan(0.0168538794049) ≈ 44.4984550191 . . . feet

The rail will bow upward by about 44.5 feet.

_____

<em>Additional comments</em>

Note that s and c in the diagram are half the lengths of the arc and the chord, respectively. The ratio of half-lengths is the same as the ratio of full lengths: c/s = 2640/2640.5 = 5280/5281.

We don't know the precise shape the arc will take, but we suspect is is not a circular arc. It seems likely to be a catenary, or something similar.

We used Newton's method iteration to refine the estimate of the angle from that shown on the graph. The iterator used is x' = x -f(x)/f'(x), where x' is the next guess based on the previous guess of x. Only a few iterations are required obtain an angle value to full calculator precision.