I think now I’m present day that money is now being transferred online and email services I think cash for no longer be used in the future because the rise of technology and how everyone is now getting so used to it and depending on tech
It would be positive it would be more clear to people and for the younger generation to learn about but for the older generation it would be much harder and would be a negative affect on them since they didn’t use technology in their days and a lot of people are still used to cash
Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
Answer:
The correct answer is option d.
Explanation:
The most effective model to understand the effect of change of a variable on other variable is by assuming other factors to be constant. This simplifies the model and helps in easily understanding the relationship between the two variables.
Though the assumption of other things being constant does not apply in the real world, it is still used as otherwise change in other factors would complicate the model. If several factors change it would be difficult to understand the relationship between variables.
Here, to study the effect of change in the price of grapes on the market for wine, it is necessary to assume other factors such as income, consumer preferences, etc to be constant.
Answer:
C) There was no price control on gasoline at the time.
Explanation:
During the 1970s the US government established a price ceiling on gasoline, but as all price ceilings set below the equilibrium price, it results in both a deadweight loss and a supply shortage.
Since the price is "too cheap", then the quantity demanded will be more than the quantity supplied. Rising costs in gasoline production made things worst, since suppliers were constantly reducing their supply of gasoline, while consumer demand was constantly increasing.
Yes, a uniform menu allows for centralized planning and distribution without having to many different factories/suppliers.
Menu:
- If the food menu is consistent, it can be said that economies of scale would be in effect. This is due to the fact that the fixed cost per unit actually gets to decrease, which then leads to a decrease in the average cost of production per unit as the sales volume keeps on increasing, giving the company a cost advantage and resulting in economies of scale. However, when extending to other nations, the menu planning becomes more difficult because local preferences and cultural norms vary widely. For example, beef is not allowed in India, thus the menu must be designed accordingly.
- McDonald's benefits from economies of scale since customers can place larger orders to reduce the price of their food when there is a standard menu across the nation. The more of a good is produced, the lower the per-unit fixed cost is since these expenses are spread across a larger number of goods, according to Investopedia. Additionally, everywhere you travel in the nation, people are aware of what is on their menu.
Learn more about menu here brainly.com/question/24068570
#SPJ4
