Answer:
The answer is: She used the justice approach, realizing that the greater good is served because people learn to help each other in their own interest.
Explanation:
Justice approach: an ethical decision is a decision that distributes benefits and costs (or punishments) among those involved in a fair, equitable, and impartial way.
Paula used this approach because she believed the agents had acted improperly and that they were harming the US Secret Service.
I consider any organization a team, so in order for it to work well its members must be respected both by their peers and by the other teams´ members. If you consider the various types of activities this specific agency carries out, other not so friendly "teams" (other secret services or even terrorists) could use this type of information to damage or compromise those activities. So the well being of all the country was being jeopardized by a group of bad agents.
Answer:
Quota rent
Explanation:
When voluntary export restraints (VER) are set up and / or import quotas are enforced, the extra profit that domestic producers make because the supply is artificially limited is called quota rent. Quota rents are a type of economic inefficiency since they produce more losses than benefits. Society as a whole generally losses while a group of favored companies make huge profits.
For example, sugar imports are limited in the US, so domestic sugar producers are able to sell sugar at much higher prices than regular international prices. That artificial extra profit earned by sugar companies in the US can be classified as quota rent.
Answer:
Procedural justice
Explanation:
Procedural justice is centered on the idea that there should be fairness in the process used in making decision or resolving disputes in a transparent way without being impartial, to ensure the process brings out the right outcomes.
Jessica believes that there’s a problem with the firm’s procedural justice as she believes her firm’s process and methods in determining increase in her salary is not fair enough.
Answer:
$90,000
Explanation:
We could allocate assembly overhead on the basis of the parts used in the assembly process:
wheels ⇒ 300,000 x 2 parts = 600,000 parts
<u>seats ⇒ 600,000 x 3 parts = 1,800,000 parts</u>
total parts assembled 2,400,000 parts
overhead costs per part assembled = $360,000 / 2,400,000 parts = $0.15 per part
so the overhead allocated to wheels should be = 600,000 parts x $0.15 per part = $90,000
Answer: Kathleen
Explanation:
English Rule is that it does not matter about anyone else in the case. So long as John owes money to Kathleen, then Kathleen is the one who can claim the money.
