Answer:
correct answer is 4) $169,000.00
Explanation:
given data
received distributions totaling = $14,000
remaining benefits lump-sum = $155,000
solution
we know that substantial payment by as distribution method not subjected to the early distribution penalty
but lum sum amount distribution before age 59.5 is subject to 10% penalty
so here we can say till 59.5 year annuity payment not changed
so amount subject to the penalty is = $14000 + $155000
amount subject to the penalty is = $169000
so correct answer is 4) $169,000.00
COBRA- Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, is the name of the federal law that guarantees employees who have lost their jobs continuing access to health insurance.
<h3>What is Federal COBRA?</h3>
When your employment terminates or your hours are reduced, federal COBRA is a law that enables you to preserve your group health coverage. All insured employees, their spouses, ex-spouses, and dependent children must be provided with continuous coverage under federal COBRA. Employers and group health plans with 20 or more members are subject to the federal COBRA.
<h3>How does COBRA work?</h3>
Under certain conditions, including voluntary or involuntary job loss, a reduction in hours worked, a change in employment, death, divorce, and other life events, the COBRA allows employees and their families who lose their health benefits to choose to continue receiving group health benefits from their group health plan for a finite amount of time. The full price for coverage up to 102% of the plan's cost may be demanded of qualified persons.
To know more about Federal laws visit: brainly.com/question/29439408
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct word for the blank space is: transformational.
Explanation:
Transformational innovations look for providing a new product or service to the market or giving an existing product differently. The innovation aims to increase the satisfaction of consumers or to solve a problem that was not addressed properly before. Transformational innovations generate a differential advantage for businesses attracting more consumers, therefore, increasing revenue.
Answer:
These policies would not contribute at all to the preservation of threatened species. Species in danger of extinction, due to their small number, must be preserved from all human acts that limit their expansion, which is why in this sense any hunting authorization of these species is unfeasible.
Even if it is regulated so that the hunting of these species is carried out in a minimal and progressive way, any threat to an animal species in danger of extinction will be a setback in the measures aimed at its conservation.
