1. True
2. False
3. True
Sorry if I get the wrong answers!!!
Answer:
change; over-estimates
Explanation:
Substitution bias refers to a tendency in which economic index numbers don't include information about the changes in consumer spending when they switch expensive products for cheaper ones or buy less units as prices change. This changes are not reflected in the market basket from which the CPI is built which can cause inflation rates to be over-estimated.
The situation that corresponds with the graph of the market for gasoline-fuelled cars is the average price of crude oil decreased, causing the price of gasoline to decrease as well.
The graph is a diagram of the demand and supply curve for gasoline-fuelled cars. There is a rightward shift of the demand curve. A rightward shift of the demand curve indicates that the demand for gasoline-fuelled cars have increased.
<u><em>Factors that can lead to a rightward shift of the demand curve for gasoline-fuelled cars</em></u>
- A decrease in the cost of a <em>complement good:</em> A <em>complement good</em> is a good that can be used together with a gasoline-fuelled car. An example of a <em>complement good</em> for gasoline-fuelled car is gasoline. If there is a decrease in the cost of gasoline, the demand for gasoline-fuelled cars would increase.
- An increase in the price of<em> substitute goods</em>: A <em>substitute good </em>is a good that can be used in place of another good. A substitute for gasoline-fuelled cars are electric cars. If the price of electric cars increase, the demand for gasoline-fuelled car would increase.
To learn more, please check: brainly.com/question/14842844?referrer=searchResults
C). Institutional Advertising.
I think This is correct
Answer:
INCREASE the consumption of Pepsi and REDUCE the consumption of Hamburger
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that Bill uses his whole budget to purchase the following :
5 cans of Pepsi
3 Hamburgers per week
And the following were the price:
Pepsi costs $1 per can
Hamburger cost $2
Bill marginal utility:
Pepsi 4
Hamburgers 6
Based on the above details this means that Bill could increase his utility by INCREASING Pepsi consumption and REDUCING hamburger consumption reason been that 5 cans of Pepsi costs $1 per can which will gives us income of $5 ($5×1) while 3 Hamburgers per week cost $2 which will give us income of $6 ($3×2) which typically means that the Hamburgers has more income that Pepsi.
Secondly since the marginal utility for Pepsi is 4 while that of Hamburgers is 6 which means that Hamburgers has higher MARGINAL UTILITY than that of Pepsi because the consumption of Hamburgers is higher than the consumption of Pepsi.
Therefore the best thing that Bill could do in order to increase his Pepsi utility is for Bill to increase Pepsi consumption and reduce hamburger consumption.