The correct answer to your question is the 1st option or option A. (emptiness)
It's an opinion because it is a belief based on the perspective that the government should be involved in stopping the extinction of animals.
<em>The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde</em> is a fascinating novel written by Robert Stevenson. It is a thriller and a little spooky which keeps the readers bind and interested.
The passage illustrates the character vs. character conflict.
<h3>The novel can be explained as:</h3>
- The passage lines are a dialogue between Lawyer Utterson and Doctor Jekyll. It shows the conflict between the two characters as they discuss giving everything to Mr Hyde.
- The lawyer disagrees with Dr Jekyll and says to him that Hyde is a terrible man. But the doctor does not agree with the lawyer and asks him to give all of his belonging to Mr Hyde.
Therefore, option 4. character vs. character is illustrated in the passage.
Learn more about The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde here:
brainly.com/question/12701725
Answer:
to set a scene
Explanation:
Dickens wanted to create the scene so the reader can visualize what he's trying to explain. hope that helps
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
This is the summary.
Frederick Douglass was an African American reformer and abolitionist who, on July 5, 1852, was invited a keynote speaker during the Independence Day celebration. There, he delivered a controversial speech about the impact of independence on black people living in America.
Right there, in the Corinthian Hall of Rochester, in the state of New York, Douglass delivered a controversial speech nobody expected. He set the tone of the speech since the very beginning of his words when he literally said "This fourth of July is yours, not mine. You may rejoice. I must mourn."
That really caught people's attention. And that was just the beginning.
In his speech, Douglass recognized the value and courage of the United States founding fathers but clearly established that those rights stated in the US Constitution were not for everyone. They were just for the white people. Not the African American people who have been suffering for racist segregation and most in the South were suffering because they were slaves.
