Answer:
B. is not liable because Mike was on a frolic of his own.
Explanation:
Mike who is a dispatch rider, decided to see his girlfriend, Jackie, who lived 50 miles off his pizza route. He had an accident while driving to his girlfriend's, and injured a pedestrian, Chuck due to his negligent driving.
Under the circumstances, Frank's Pizza isn't liable because Mike was on a frolic of his own. Mike embarking on a 50 mile drive to see his girlfriend is frolicsome and outside the scope of his employment as a delivery agent.
Hence, this will absolve his employer from any liability as he wasn't working on the designated route at the time.
Answer:
I'm on here most of the time.
Explanation:
If you'd like, I'll try to answer all of your questions! Just give me the word. :)
A) there are no close substitutes
Explanation:
A monopoly results when there is a single provider of a particular good or service. Since they’re the only company providing that good or service, the consumer must conduct their business with that specific provider. For example, imagine that Walmart is the only store you can buy food from. Walmart would dominate the entire supply market as it would be the only store from which you can buy your food.
Option D
This procedure is most similar to: reinforcer sampling.
<h3><u>
Explanation: </u></h3>
A method that permits an individual to get in association with a potential reinforcer to encounter the concrete aspects of the stimulus. The method helps develop new reinforcing outcomes for a given individual.
Reinforcer sampling includes composing freely accessible a piece of a potential reinforcer to improve the probability that the importance and power of the reinforcer will be maximized when it is performed available contingently. Reinforcer assessment transfers to the observation-driven or interview-based analysis of the relevant power of stimuli.