Since both the input and the output assume only integer values, the function is classified as discrete.
<h3>What are continuous and discrete variables?</h3>
- Continuous variables: Can assume decimal values, hence they are represented by rational numbers.
- Discrete variables: Assume only countable values, such as 1, 2, 3, …, hence they are represented by whole numbers, or even integers if it can be negative.
In this problem, all values on the table assume only integer values, hence the function is classified as discrete.
More can be learned about classification of variables at brainly.com/question/16978770
#SPJ1
Step-by-step explanation:
3
Let D be the mid point of side BC, [B(2, - 1), C(5, 2)].
Therefore, by mid-point formula:
4 (a)
Equation of line AB[A(2, 1), B(-2, - 11)] in two point form is given as:
is the equation of line AB.
Now we have to check whether C(4, 7) lie on line AB or not.
Let us substitute x = 4 & y = 7 on the Left hand side of equation of line AB and if it gives us 0, then C lies on the line.
Hence, point C (4, 7) lie on the straight line AB.
4(b)
Like we did in 4(a), first find the equation of line AB and then substitute the coordinates of point C in equation and if they satisfy the equation, then all the three points lie on the straight line.
18k i believe because it is a varible and a number so when u multiply them u just put them together.... is this multi choice question because to see the answers would help
Tomas used incorrectly the rule of signs, the expression should be simplified as follows:
-2.6 + (-5.4)
-2.6 -5.4 = 8
<h3>
</h3><h3>
What mistake did Tomas likely make?</h3>
Here Tomas wants to perform an addition between two numbers:
-2.6 + (-5.4)
And the outcome that Tomas gets is:
-2.6 + (-5.4) = 2.8
Here his mistake seems to bee that he thought the second number was a positive number, and he solved the operation:
-2.6 + 5.4
So, he used wrong the rule of signs.
Remember that the rule of signs says that:
(-)*(+) = (+)*(-) = (-)
Using that, we can rewrite the original expression:
-2.6 + (-5.4)
to:
-2.6 - 5.4
Solving that, we get:
-2.6 - 5.4 = -8
Which is the outcome that Tomas would have gotten if he had used correctly the rule of signs.
If you want to learn more about the rule of signs:
brainly.com/question/13333620
#SPJ1
Complete question :
Anand needs to hire a plumber. He's considering a plumber that charges an initial fee of $65 along with an
hourly rate of $28. The plumber only charges for a whole number of hours. Anand would like to spend no more than $250, and he wonders how many hours of work he can afford.
Let H represent the whole number of hours that the plumber works.
1) Which inequality describes this scenario?
Choose 1 answer:
A. 28 + 65H < 250
B. 28 + 65H > 250
C. 65 + 28H < 250
D. 65 +28H > 250
2) What is the largest whole number of hours that Anand can afford?
Answer:
65 + 28H < 250
Number of hours Anand can afford = 6 hours
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the following information :
Initial hourly rate = $65
Hourly rate = $28
Number of hours worked (whole number) = H
Maximum budgeted amount to spend = $250
Therefore ;
(Initial charge + total charge in hours) should not be more than $250
$65 + ($28*H) < $250
65 + 28H < 250
Number of hours Anand can afford :
65 + 28H < 250
28H < 250 - 65
28H < 185
H < (185 / 28)
H < 6.61
Sinve H is a whole number, the number of hours he can afford is 6 hours
