All categories

3 years ago

HURRRRYY !!!

Physics

2 answers:

Ksenya-84 [330]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Resistor

Explanation:

I took this test on edg and b/c I take notes

Hope this helps :)

emmasim [6.3K]3 years ago

6 0

Its Resistor, i just took the test.

You might be interested in

PLEASE ANSWER THESE 2 questions. ASAP!!! Will mark brainiest

arsen [322]

Pretty sure it’s axial because it protects the brain,spinal cord and organs.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In a simple electric generator, a conducting loop of wire is placed in a magnetic field. The loop of wire is then rotated. Why i

kaheart [24]

Explanation:

If a coil of wire is placed in a magnetic field and rotated, an alternating (sinusoidal) current is induced. As it rotates, sometimes it is cutting through lots of magnetic flux, and so lots of current is

induced.

At other times, it is moving parallel to

the flux, and so no flux is cut, and no current is induced. In between, some current is induced. This creates an alternating current. Either end of the coil can be connected to wires outside of the generator in order to use the current elsewhere. This would be fine for the

first few rotations, but after this, the wires would get tangled up and the generator would be useless. To avoid this, we use a commutator. In an AC generator, this is a pair of rotating conducting 'slip rings' attached to either end of the coil. Carbon brushes bring these into contact with the outside world.

5 0

3 years ago

Ed and his friends are guessing which five items will sink or float. What is true for any item that sinks?

katovenus [111]

Any item that sinks has a greater density then that of the surrounding liquids

8 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is true about light waves and sound waves? A. Sound waves can move at different speeds, but light waves a

vivado [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

Sound waves speed up noticeably when moving through a solid or liquid, because all it is is just particles colliding; and particles are way closer together with those states of matter.

The speed of light can change when moving through different substances, but this is dependent on complicated factors such as frequency, polarization, intensity, et. cetera

The important part is that it does change speed, so your answer is C.

Hope this helps!

3 0

4 years ago

Three ideal polarizing filters are stacked, with the polarizing axis of the second and third filters at 21 degrees and 61 degree

kvv77 [185]

Answer:

When second polarizer is removed the intensity after it passes through the stack is

$I_f_3 = 27.57 W/cm^2$

2 When third polarizer is removed the intensity after it passes through the stack is

$I_f_2 = 102.24 W/cm^2$

Explanation:

From the question we are told that

The angle of the second polarizing to the first is $\theta_2 = 21^o$

The angle of the third polarizing to the first is $\theta_3 = 61^o$

The unpolarized light after it pass through the polarizing stack $I_u = 60 W/cm^2$

Let the initial intensity of the beam of light before polarization be $I_p$

Generally when the unpolarized light passes through the first polarizing filter the intensity of light that emerges is mathematically evaluated as

$I_1 = \frac{I_p}{2}$

Now according to Malus’ law the intensity of light that would emerge from the second polarizing filter is mathematically represented as

$I_2 = I_1 cos^2 \theta_1$

$= \frac{I_p}{2} cos ^2 \theta_1$

The intensity of light that will emerge from the third filter is mathematically represented as

$I_3 = I_2 cos^2(\theta_2 - \theta_1 )$

$I_3= \frac{I_p}{2}(cos^2 \theta_1)[cos^2(\theta_2 - \theta_1)]$

making $I_p$ the subject of the formula

$I_p = \frac{2L_3}{(cos^2 \theta [cos^2 (\theta_2 - \theta_1)])}$

Note that $I_u = I_3$ as $I_3$ is the last emerging intensity of light after it has pass through the polarizing stack

Substituting values

$I_p = \frac{2 * 60 }{(cos^2(21) [cos^2 (61-21)])}$

$I_p = \frac{2 * 60 }{(cos^2(21) [cos^2 (40)])}$

$=234.622W/cm^2$

When the second is removed the third polarizer becomes the second and final polarizer so the intensity of light would be mathematically evaluated as

$I_f_3 = \frac{I_p}{2} cos ^2 \theta_2$

$I_f_3$ is the intensity of the light emerging from the stack

substituting values

$I_f_3 = \frac{234.622}{2} * cos^2(61)$

$I_f_3 = 27.57 W/cm^2$

When the third polarizer is removed the second polarizer becomes the

the final polarizer and the intensity of light emerging from the stack would be

$I_f_2 = \frac{I_p}{2} cos ^2 \theta_1$

$I_f_2$ is the intensity of the light emerging from the stack

Substituting values

$I_f_2 = \frac{234.622}{2} cos^2 (21)$

$I_f_2 = 102.24 W/cm^2$

7 0

3 years ago