First, notice that:
![2\tan (\frac{x}{2})=2\cdot(\pm\sqrt[]{\frac{1-cosx}{1+\cos x})}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=2%5Ctan%20%28%5Cfrac%7Bx%7D%7B2%7D%29%3D2%5Ccdot%28%5Cpm%5Csqrt%5B%5D%7B%5Cfrac%7B1-cosx%7D%7B1%2B%5Ccos%20x%7D%29%7D)
And in the denominator we have:

then, we have on the original expression:
![\begin{gathered} \frac{2\tan(\frac{x}{2})}{1+\tan^2(\frac{x}{2})}=\frac{2\cdot\pm\sqrt[]{\frac{1-\cos x}{1+cosx}}}{\frac{2}{1+\cos x}}=\frac{2\cdot(\pm\sqrt[]{1-cosx})\cdot(1+\cos x)}{2\cdot(\sqrt[]{1+cosx})} \\ =(\sqrt[]{1-\cos x})\cdot(\sqrt[]{1+\cos x})=\sqrt[]{(1-\cos x)(1+\cos x)} \\ =\sqrt[]{1-\cos^2x}=\sqrt[]{\sin^2x}=\sin x \end{gathered}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbegin%7Bgathered%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B2%5Ctan%28%5Cfrac%7Bx%7D%7B2%7D%29%7D%7B1%2B%5Ctan%5E2%28%5Cfrac%7Bx%7D%7B2%7D%29%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B2%5Ccdot%5Cpm%5Csqrt%5B%5D%7B%5Cfrac%7B1-%5Ccos%20x%7D%7B1%2Bcosx%7D%7D%7D%7B%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B1%2B%5Ccos%20x%7D%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B2%5Ccdot%28%5Cpm%5Csqrt%5B%5D%7B1-cosx%7D%29%5Ccdot%281%2B%5Ccos%20x%29%7D%7B2%5Ccdot%28%5Csqrt%5B%5D%7B1%2Bcosx%7D%29%7D%20%5C%5C%20%3D%28%5Csqrt%5B%5D%7B1-%5Ccos%20x%7D%29%5Ccdot%28%5Csqrt%5B%5D%7B1%2B%5Ccos%20x%7D%29%3D%5Csqrt%5B%5D%7B%281-%5Ccos%20x%29%281%2B%5Ccos%20x%29%7D%20%5C%5C%20%3D%5Csqrt%5B%5D%7B1-%5Ccos%5E2x%7D%3D%5Csqrt%5B%5D%7B%5Csin%5E2x%7D%3D%5Csin%20x%20%5Cend%7Bgathered%7D)
therefore, the identity equals to sinx
Answer:
It's the first option.
Step-by-step explanation:
y = cos x transformed to cos (x - π/2) moves the graph π/2 units to the right.
Multiplying by 3 to give 3 cos(x - π/2) stretches the graph 3 units parallel to the y-axis and adding 3 to this moves the graph up 3 units.
So the required equation is y = 3(cos x - π/2) + 3.
Answer: 
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following formula, used to calculate the value of an used car according to the years after the car was originally bought:

Where
is the price of the car when it was bought new, and
is the number of years the car was used.
Solving the formula with the given data:
This is the value of the car according to the formula.
However, this value can be approximated to:

Answer:
Option C, 262 cm^3
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Step 1: Substitute 5 for radius and 10 for height</u>
V = 1/3 * pi * r^2 * h
V = 1/3 * pi * (5)^2 * (10)
V = 1/3 * pi * 25 * 10
V = 250pi/3
V = 261.79
Answer: Option C, 262 cm^3
Answer:
C) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean attendance is greater than 523.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let μ be the the average attendance at games of the football team
The claim: the average attendance at games is over 523
Null and alternative hypotheses are:
: μ=523
: μ>523
The conclusion is failure to reject the null hypothesis.
This means that <em>test statistic</em> is lower than <em>critical value</em>. Therefore it is not significant, there is no significant evidence to accept the <em>alternative</em> hypothesis.
That is no significant evidence that the average attendance at games of the football team is greater than 523.