In the capitalization versus expensing case the main ethical issue is whether Gloria Hernandez should capitalize or expense one millions dollars of expenditures.
<h3>What is meant by capitalization?</h3>
This is the term that is used in accounting to talk about the fact that an item can be recorded as an asset. What this means is that the expenditure is going to be made to appear in the balance sheet and it would not have to appear in the income statement.
Hence we have to say that In the capitalization versus expensing case the main ethical issue is whether Gloria Hernandez should capitalize or expense one millions dollars of expenditures.
Read more on capitalization here: brainly.com/question/1293334
#SPJ1
Compound interest would be the correct answer.
Answer:
a. $3,780,000
Explanation:
According to the scenario, calculation of the given data are as follows
New equipment = $3,600,000
Shipping and installation = $180,000
We can calculate the total cost of Martson's new equipment by using following formula,
Total Cost = New equipment cost + Shipping and Installation cost
By putting the value, we get
Total Cost = $3,600,000 + $180,000
= $3,780,000
Answer:
the long-run framework.
Explanation:
In Economics, Growth can be defined as an increase or rise in the level of output and production of goods and services over a specific period of time by a business entity.
Issues of growth are generally considered by economists in the long-run framework because growth itself is a long-run phenomenon in economics.
A long-run growth refers to the continuous and sustained increase in the level of output of goods and services or quantity of production that a business is able to achieve.
Hence, all of the four factors of production affects the level of growth that is being experienced by an individual or organization. These factors are;
1. Capital.
2. Labor.
3. Land.
4. Entrepreneur.
<em>In a nutshell, business owners and economist usually consider the growth of a business as a long-run phenomenon rather than as a short-run phenomenon. </em>
Answer:
could likely result in a notable loss of sales to competitors
Explanation:
In the case of the perfect competitive market wheen the price of the firm is increased from $179 to $199 as compared to the prevailing market price so this means that there should be the loss with respect to the sales for the competitors or rivalrs as this would result the firm to lose its overall shares to its rivalry
Therefore the above statement should be considered true
