Answer:
E) Bright: No dominant strategy, Sparkle: Strategy 1
Explanation:
The payoff matrix above shows the profits associated with the strategic decisions of two oligopoly firms, Bright Company and Sparkle Company. The first entries in each cell show the profits to Bright and the second the profits to Sparkle. What are the dominant strategies for Bright and Sparkle, respectively?
Bright: No dominant strategy, Sparkle: Strategy 1
Answer:
The company could pay up to 866,965.89 dollars today to solve the current heat exchanger situation
Explanation:
We have to determinate the present value of 7 year annuity which increase at a rate of 7% when the cost of capital is 15% being the first quota 175,000 dollars
grow rate 0.07
required return 0.15
Cuota 175,000
n 7
PV = 866,965.89
Answer: Core customer value
Explanation:
Core customer value could be seen as focusing on customers who basically buy your product and what can be done to keep them or improve services for them. Most manufactures are on the lookout on what their customers really want and how they can give it to them in a great manner which would also be affordable. Customers are gold, hence, when not treated well they can be lost to another manufacturer considering the competition of the market. Core customer value focuses on what better can the manufacturer offer the customer.
Answer:
The answer is option B. For a levered firm, flotation costs should <u>be spread over the life of a project, thereby reducing the cash flows for each year of the project.</u>
Explanation:
When a company’s securities are listed on a public exchange, there is a general saying that securities are floated on the exchange. That is how the name flotation costs came about.
Flotation is actually the costs incurred by a company in issuing its securities to public. it is also called issuance costs.
Examples of Flotation costs include charges paid to the investment bankers, lawyers, accountants, registration fees of the securities regulator and the exchange on which the issue is to be listed.
Flotation cost would vary based on several factors, such as company’s size, issue size, issue type (debt vs equity),
In summary, Flotation costs are the cost a company incurs to issue new stock making new equity cost more than existing ones.
Business analysts argue that flotation costs are a one-time expense that should be adjusted out of future cash flows in order to not overstate the cost of capital forever.
It is based on this premise that i chose option B, which states that flotation costs be spread over the life of a project thereby reducing the cash flows for each year of the project at levered firms.
In the given situation, the systems property illustrated is called equifinality. The case says that there three people were fired at ABC Corporation. Eugene was fired because he was incompetent. Rita was fired because she was unethical. Kayla was fired because of economic conditions. Equifinality in business implies that firms may establish similar competitive advantages based on substantially different competencies. The concept is that there are many paths to the same end. The idea states that there are multiple ways to reach a final goal. In open systems, equifinality states that in open systems a given end state can be reached by many potential means.
