Hello. You did not present the answer options, which makes it impossible for your question to be answered accurately.
However, we can say that the biggest elements that exist in a market economy, but do not exist in a capitalist system is the production of goods and services determined by the concepts of demand and supply. This is because in the market economy, the production of goods and services is determined by these two elements, whereas in the communist system, this production is determined by the government.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The case about which the question is referring to is Griswold v. Connecticut.
The Griswold v. Connecticut was the case in which Estelle Griswold, an Executive Director of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut and Dr C. Lee Buxton opened a clinic to counsel the married couples educating and counselling them about preventing contraception.
In Connecticut, the use of contraception or giving counselling about the same was a punishable offence with a fine of $50. Griswold and Buxton had challenged this law of Connecticut and were arrested with a fine. After there case being upheld in Appellate Division Court and Connecticut Supreme Court, Griswold appealed her case in the Supreme Court of the United States in 1965. In the same year, the Supreme Court gave a verdict in favour of Griswold based on the 14th Amendment of the Due Process which gives a right to privacy.
So, the answer is true.
<span>These experiences are not limited to one brain pathway, but several. The ability for us to recognize faces is but one part of our overall experience, and shows that there are many systems that interact when performing even the simplest of tasks.</span>
Answer: naturalistic observation
Explanation: Naturalistic observation is a technique used in the study of subjects in their natural habitat without any manipulation or interference from the observer. The aim of naturalistic observation is to describe in detail the behaviour of an organism in their natural setting, situation or habitat.
Conducting a naturalistic observation offers some advantages which include:
I) allowing investigation of behaviours that occur in complex social settings.
II) allowing the researcher to gather qualitative as well as quantitative data and
III) allowing the development of theories based on collected observations etc.
However, it is less useful in studying well-defined hypotheses under precisely specified conditions since they are typically designed not to confirm previously formed hypotheses.
I believe the answer is: the Spanish-American War.
President monroe has always been an outspoken anti colinialist that condemn what the europan nations did towarh north american, African, and Asian citizens.
Monroe's doctrine influence the Spanish-American War that initiated to helped south american countries in obtaining their freedom from Spanish's colonialism.
