C i take that test lest moth
na’nilkad bee na’niltin – learning from herding: an ethnoarchaeological study of historic pastoralism in the Navajo Nation
In the Southwest of the United States, Navajo (Diné) sheepherding has changed significantly in size and intensity over time.
The Navajo Treaty of 1868 was signed 150 years ago, and during that time, a number of internal and external influences altered the Diné tribes' traditional pastoral methods.
An ethnoarchaeological examination of the past, settlement patterns, and pastoral land use of one Navajo family in Black Mesa Chapter, Arizona, was the primary focus of Phase 1 of the Early Navajo Pastoral Landscape Project.
This article provides the project's findings and explores their significance in light of current local and regional affairs as well as methodological issues pertinent to the location of sheepherding locations throughout the Navajo Nation and elsewhere.
Learn more about pastoralism here
brainly.com/question/14497302
#SPJ4
Answer:
Correct answer is Pax Romana occurred while Rome was an empire when wars were less frequent and the empire grew strong.
Explanation:
A is not correct as during the Republic were a lot of unrests. Slave revolts, Civil wars between Sula and Gaius Marius, Caesar and Pompey, Octavian and Marcus Aurelius, Punic wars... It was hard to establish peace.
B is correct as during Octavian Augustus reign Rome as an empire spread its boundaries and for a period of around 200 years led not so frequent wars, which were successful. Roman culture, economy and all other aspects of society were flourishing.
C is not correct because as we said during period of Republic there were many unrests.
D is not correct as Julius Caesar led many military campaigns, mostly in Gaul and Britain and a civil war against Pompey.
Answer: conditioned stimulus
Explanation: Ivan Pavlov first discovered the process of classical conditioning in his experiments on the digestive response of dogs. He noticed that the dogs naturally salivated in response to food, but that the animals also began to drool whenever they saw the white coat of the lab assistant who delivered the food. According to Pavlov conditioned stimulus are responsible for the action.
<span> Depending on who is giving their opinion this project was either a great success, or a large waste of time and money. The supporters of the project have several valid points. Their first point is that it has helped dramatically with downstream flooding and has saved many lives and destruction. The second point is that this is a renewable and clean source of energy that is saving our environment with almost zero emissions. Although the dam has displaced many people, the reservoir created upstream has provided recreation for many people. To the supporters, the dam has saved the environment and most importantly human lives. The people who are against the dam also have several valid statements. The dam is detrimental to the environment by disrupting the fish migrations, thus lowering fish populations and hurting fishermen. The dam also has destroyed a lot of habitat upstream forcing animals to move (fragmentation). The main point made by the negative is the displacement of over 1.3 million people. The time, money, and effort made to move so many people is not worth such a small amount of energy produced by the dam. </span><span> Overall, this dam can be seen as good or evil. In reality, it is built to stay and the negatives frankly have to deal with its existence. Either way one looks at the dam one thing can be concluded, new energy sources need to be developed. Solar is a great method of energy generation, yet at this point it is only 10% efficient. Scientists worldwide need to begin to enhance wind, solar, nuclear, hydro, and search for new innovative methods that will save the world from an energy crisis. </span>