Answer:
The amount of the distributive share of partnership net income that is taxable by California is the share of the partnership's net income of $10,000 that can be attributed to Ewan.
Assuming he holds a 50% interest in the partnership, he is expected to pay tax on his share of the $10,000 (which is equal to $5,000) in California, where the income is earned and not where he resides.
Explanation:
A partnership as an entity does not pay taxes. But individual partners must pay taxes on their shares of the partnership income, whether it is actually distributed or not. The partnership usually lists the partners' income on Schedule K-1, while individual partners fill the normal individual tax returns.
Payroll (a) but not 1000% sure
Proximate cause represents the proposition that a negligent party is legally liable only for the foreseeable risk that they cause.
A proximate cause, as used in both law and insurance, is an event that is sufficiently connected to an injury for the courts to recognize it as the injury's primary cause. The legal system distinguishes between proximate (also known as legal) cause and cause-in-fact. The "but for" test is used to identify cause-in-fact: Without the action, the outcome would not have occurred. (For instance, if the driver had not run the red light, the collision would not have happened.) Although the action is a necessary precondition for the injury, it might not be sufficient in and of itself. There are a few situations where the but for test is useless.
Learn more about Proximate cause, here
brainly.com/question/13885854
#SPJ4
Answer:
c. No. The taste buds get replaced every ten days or so, so he is likely to regain his sense of taste.
Explanation:
Our taste buds are the taste receptor cells that allow us to specify the type of taste that we can detect as sweet, sour, salty, bitter, etc. These taste buds are located at the upper surface of the tongue and detect the type of taste that comes from the foods we consume.
So, even though the man may think his taste buds are permanently damaged, that is not the case. Taste buds can be permanently damaged but only in cases of burning the tongue with hot foods. Since spices can't damage taste buds, his opinion of his taste buds permanently damaged is wrong. Our taste buds get replaced every 10 days or two weeks. So, in his case, he will regain his taste buds after some days.
Therefore, his act of suing the local restaurant does not have any merit. Thus, the <u>correct answer is option c</u>.
Answer:
Depends on the driver if hes a good driver or not
