False because philology is about discussing different points of view and it’s impossible that they all agree
No according to me the parole system should not be abolished but it should be more strict and done in more specific platforms cases.
Explanation:
According to my opinion, the parole should not be abolished but it should be categorized for some specific cases. The court system needs to define or create a category in which some specific or certain cases fall.
On the basis of nature of case, the court need to grant parole such as in theft cases while in cases like murder, attempt to murder, kidnapping which are more dangerous in nature, should not grant parole.
Thus specification is a required amendment rather than abolishing.
Answer:
They Decide if they are going to open the case
it states that the federal government laws are the supreme laws of the land and what the federal government can or cannot do, i believe
Answer:
Confirming appointments of judges and justices.
Explanation:
One of the most important ways in which Congress can exert some control over the judicial branch is by appointing and confirming judges and justices. However, there are several other ways in which Congress can control the judiciary. For example, Congress may impeach judges, alter the way the court system is organized and amend the Constitution.
