Number one is A
number two is A
Answer:
In Japan, business relations operate within the context of WA which stresses group harmony and social cohesion
In China, business behavior revolves around GUANXI or personal relations
In South Korea, activities involve concern for INHWA, or harmony based on respect of hierarchical relationships, including obedience to authority.
Explanation:
Wa, Guanxi and Inhwa are principles of management in Japan, China and Korea respectively.
WA as practiced by the Japanese involves sacrificing individual goals and prioritizing working together in groups. People cooperate with, and are loyal to each other to attain group goals.
The Chinese practice GUANXI by forming a network of informal and personal relationships or friendships between each other to obtain favors and benefits
INHWA as practiced by the Koreans focuses on relationship between people with unequal status in society. It demands loyalty from subordinates to their superiors and also that superiors show concern for their subordinates' well-being.
It is an overtly political work and functions as ideological criticism- this statement best describes Juan O' Gorman's mural Panel of the Independence–Father Hidalgo (Retablo de la Independencia–Hidalgo).
Option: B
Explanation:
Juan O' Gorman was an architect who designs various buildings in Mexico and spain. He was renowned cultural and historical heritage of Mexican civilization. It was an overtly political work and functions as ideological criticism of Father Hidalgo.
Though it was not an abstract expressionist work. Architectural work was actually a significant cultural and socio economic heritage holder of the civilization. It can not be detached from any specific cultural and historical context.
Scientific management of a factory's workforce will make the factories output <span>more productive. Scientific management monitors the movements of each employee i</span><span>n order to make them more efficient.
</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is "The fundamental attribution error".
Explanation:
The fundamental attribution error is the human tendency to emphasize personal characteristics instead of analyzing the contextual or situational explanation for other people's behavior.
<u>For example, when someone fails a test, the other students may think that their classmate failed because he is lazy or he didn't study enough and not because the questions of the test were wrongly formulated</u>.
In this particular case, the first attribution that one does to the jam is that the couple did it because they are bad communicators, only because they were arguing moments before, <u>rather than attributing the failure to get the frame to through the doorway to the possibility that it might be too big for the doorway.</u>
In conclusion, this is an example of the fundamental attribution error.
