Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

8

Please help me with my algebra work.

1 answer:

alexgriva [62]3 years ago

6 0

The answer is A. 0.41

You might be interested in

The hot air balloon is at 175ft and the fish is swimming at -10 feet what is the difference between them?

pashok25 [27]

The answer is 165 ft because 175- -10= 165

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

35.66<br> Simplify the expression<br> 33.64

Varvara68 [4.7K]

I’m pretty sure it’s 34

7 0

3 years ago

A cell phone company orders 500 new phones from a manufacturer. If the probability of a phone being defective is 2.9%, predict h

Maurinko [17]

About 15 phones are likely to be defective.

4 0

3 years ago

Joe is about to go on holidays for four weeks. His weekly salary is $280 and his holiday loading is 17.5% of four weeks pay.

Maslowich

The answer would be 19040

3 0

3 years ago

Formalize the following argument by using the given predicates and then rewriting the argument as a numbered sequence of stateme

sergiy2304 [10]

Answer:

The answer is " $\bold{((P_2 \wedge P_3)\longrightarrow P_1 \longrightarrow P_1 }$ ".

Step-by-step explanation:

Let assuming the following predicates:

$\to B(x,y)= \text{x barks at y} \\\\\to D (x)= \text{x is a dog} \\\\\to C (x)= \text{x is a cat} \\\\$

In the given table it calculates the numbered sequence, which is given in the statement and calculates the other details, please find the attached file.

Premise P1 means whether dogs are shouting at cats.

Premise P2 means Maximum is a dog.

Premise P3 means that a cat is Moonbeam.

Unless the assumptions P1, P2, and P3 all are valid, otherwise the conclusion that Maximum starts barking at Moonbeam also is correct.

By both the law of deduction of Modus Ponens, statement 4 is the interpretation of states 1, 2, and 3. That conclusion can thus be conveyed as follows:

so, the final answer is " $\bold{((P_2 \wedge P_3)\longrightarrow P_1 \longrightarrow P_1 }$ "

5 0

4 years ago