Answer:
ISSUE Whether flag burning constitutes "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment. RULING Yes. REASONING (5-4) The majority of the Court, according to Justice William Brennan, agreed with Johnson and held that flag burning constitutes a form of "symbolic speech" that is protected by the First Amendment.
Explanation:
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that invalidated prohibitions on desecrating the American flag enforced in 48 of the 50 states.
Answer:
c. make the norms salient to participants.
Explanation:
Field experiment: In psychological research, the term "field experiment" is described as one of the different studies that utilize "experimental design" that happens in any natural setting. While conducting a field experiment, the experimenter tends to examine or analyze the degree to which the manipulation of a single independent variable causes a change or alteration in the given dependent variable related to the natural environment.
In the question above, the researchers suggest that the specific role of the given confederate in the mentioned study was to make the particular norms salient to participants as it is significantly described that participants will model the confederate's behavior i.e, they will get influenced.
On May 31, the Mecklenburg<span> County Committee of Safety adopted these “</span>resolves<span>,” or resolutions, which declared all royal authority to be suspended. ... In 1819, a </span>document<span> called the </span>Mecklenburg<span> Declaration of Independence was published, with the claim that it had been written on May 20, 1775.</span>
