Answer:
concurring
Explanation:
a concurring opinion is in certain legal systems a written opinion by one or more judges of a court which agrees with the decision made by the majority of the court, but states different or additional reasons as the basis for their decision.
Answer:
Under Case Law, in each period a Court of Law can, in principle, either take a forward looking, tough, or a myopic, weak decision. Under Statute Law, all Courts are constrained to behave in the same way
Explanation:
hope it help
Answer:
The legal school of thought illustrated in this dialogue is:
Law and economics school of thought.
Explanation:
The law and economics school of thought postulates that economic analyses, theories, and methods should be brought to the practice and interpretation of laws. This means that the tools of economic reasoning are the best tools for justified and consistent legal practices. This school of thought is significantly one of the dominant theories of jurisprudence.
Answer: Option A
Explanation: The modification of the pickup truck that weighed 4,000 pounds is getting modified.
There are certain rules for the modification of vehicles and one of them states that the bottom of the front bumper must not be more than 28 inches above the pavement for the vehicles weighing 3,500 lbs. or more.
The rules are different for different countries. Some countries have variation in the distances between the bumper and pavement. It varies depending on various factors such as the weight of the vehicle and its modification, et cetera.
The common range lies between 16 to 30 inches indicating that the distance between the front bumper and pavement should not be less than 16 inches and not more than 30 inches.
