I know one of them is 1/2
First you would have to convert , so 12 inches = 1 foot . So do 12 X 16= 192inches, then subtract 192-6=186inches should be the difference IN INCHES. If you need it in feet divide 186 by 12 which should give you 15.5feet
The <em><u>correct answers</u></em> are:
Supplementary; ∠2 and ∠3; substitution; 2.
Explanation:
Supplementary angles are angles whose measures sum to 180°. Thus this is the first answer.
Since we are told that ∠2 and ∠3 are supplementary, their measures sum to 180° and they are the second answer.
We know that m∠1 + m∠2 = 180° and m∠2 + m∠3 = 180°. We can substitute "m∠2 + m∠3" for 180° in the first equation; this is the substitution property.
To isolate m∠1 on the right, we will subtract m∠2 from each side, and get that m∠1 = m∠3 and the angles are congruent.
Answer:
Statement 3
Step-by-step explanation:
∠GAF ≅ ∠TAE
Since, there is no relation between these angles,
Therefore, statement is False.
∠TAE and ∠FAH are complementary.
If the sum of the two angles is 90°, pair of angles is said to be complimentary angles.
Therefore, this statement is False.
∠TAF is obtuse.
Measure of obtuse angle is more than 90°
From the given picture, measure of ∠TAF = m∠TAH + m∠HAF
= 90° + 50°
= 140°
Here, m∠TAF > 90°
Therefore, ∠TAF is an obtuse angle.
Statement (3) is the correct statement.
Answer:
It is an identity, the proof is in the explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
csc(A)-cot(A)=tan(A/2)
I'm going to start with right hand side
tan(A/2)=(1-cos(a))/(sin(a)) half angle identity
tan(A/2)=1/sin(a)-cos(a)/sin(a) separate fraction
tan(A/2)=csc(a)-cot(a) reciprocal and quotient identities