1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kaylis [27]
3 years ago
10

After the Boston tea party, the British government closed the port of Boston until order was restored and the cost of the lost t

ea had been repaid. Far away colonies like New York and South Carolina began to send food and supplies to Boston by road. What conclusions can you draw about the other colonies from this ?
History
1 answer:
Sloan [31]3 years ago
7 0

I can conclude that the other colonies wanted to help. They had saw that Boston needed help such as food and supplies like you said and they gave them it. With the closing of the port, it was very hard for them to receive these items by trade with other nations/colonies. (By sea I mean) Therefore, someone had to step in. I can also see that they are better people than the ones in our society today. Many have an all men for themselves policy. A minimal amount of people help those who are in trouble nowadays. (Ex: the homeless, they always need food, water, and shelter and never have anything)  Another conclusion is that greed was not as popular back then. That goes off of the whole all men for themselves policy.  

Need anymore??

You might be interested in
Explain the ways mining shaped the West
Paha777 [63]

Answer

1. It set in a process that led to displacement, removal and relocation of the natives

2. Mining rested on the white American talent for claiming legitimacy

3. Created a rapid urbanization kind of settlement

Explanation

There was a friction between miners and Indians during the rush for Gold mining that resulted into the displacement of the natives. Mining in California rested on the white American talent for claiming legitimacy. This is to say that most of them were newcomers yet it did not prevent them from claiming legitimacy of the place as occupants ignoring natives that had the right to local resources. Mining in the west brought concentrated populations, where the mining patterns of settlements turned out to be the future settlement pattern of the region.


7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Friedan interviewed many women who were not happy with their suburban lives and she eventually worked to change society's expect
Hunter-Best [27]
True...Friedan published the Feminine Mystic...Friedan worked for womens' rights...
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
how did industrialization and expansion bring about the competing forces of nationalism and sectionalism
IrinaVladis [17]
To industrialize so that they could catch up with western powers or stay strong, they had to constantly use natural resources. Once they realized that their own natural resources were not enough, they had to expand imperialistically; that is, acquiring overseas/overland colonies, such as the British in India producing cotton and textiles and the Spanish in Latin America.

As time went on and the abuses of these mother nations went on, those who were ruled over decided to band together as a common ethnic group with the same goal of getting rid of their rulers and unifying their split up groups. This resulted in the unification of people, an independent nation, as well as the removal of foreign powers within that nation.

Examples include the various revolutions throughout the west: the American, French, Haitian, and Latin American revolutions, as well as the revolutions throughout Africa: the revolutions in Algeria, Angola, and Ghana.

However, not all people within a nation were entirely for this idea, resulting in the competing forces of nationalism and sectionalism. For example, during the process of unification in Italy, there were areas of modern Italy that were very different from the other parts of Italy, becoming an obstacle for unification. Specifically, Piedmont, which is Northern Italy today, was industrialized and had a centralized system of governance, while areas in Southern Italy, such as Sicily, were poor and still had an agrarian society.
6 0
3 years ago
What was the number one threat to Native Americans *
vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

Conquistadors

Explanation:

Conquistadors are there to take over whatever land they have

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you agree with the author being interviewed about why the Industrial Revolution
Readme [11.4K]

I agree with the author that the world Industrial Revolution did not first happen in China.

<h3>What is Industrial Revolution?</h3>

An Industrial Revolution refers to shift in process of agrarian economy to an industrial and machine economy.

The first Industrial Revolution happened in Britain in the area of manufacturing processes.

In China. the first industrial revolution was experienced between the 1988 - 1998 which features a mass production of labor-intensive light consumer goods across the country.

in conclusion, I agree with the author on the stance.

Read more about Industrial Revolution

<em>brainly.com/question/900939</em>

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which American leader best exemplified the Enlightenment through his scientific discoveries and inventions
    15·2 answers
  • Who conducted experiments with uranium-containing minerals and pure uranium?
    13·1 answer
  • What did Zacharias say John would do? Use complete sentences.
    13·1 answer
  • Why would a lord face at least as much danger from invaders as a peasant would?
    12·2 answers
  • Why were absolute monarchies more common Eastern Europe than in Western Europe?
    9·1 answer
  • What was the U.S. military goal in the Pacific?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following choices contributed to Eisenhower winning the presidency?
    5·1 answer
  • What is a living wage? Why was it a suggested reform during the Gilded Age?
    6·1 answer
  • Who was not a Totalitarian leader during WWII?
    11·2 answers
  • Why was the launch of sputnik in 1957 important? most in the u.s. had not thought the soviets were capable of producing satellit
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!