Answer:
idek lol
Step-by-step explanation:
heheheheehhehehehehehehehehheheheehhe
Answer:
- Timmy has successfully shown Suzie's conjecture is incorrect
- Suzie's conjecture is correct if the smallest square in the sum is 1
Step-by-step explanation:
The sum of odd numbers 1 .. n is ((n+1)/2)², a perfect square. Suzie is right about that. What Timmy has shown is that she is incorrect that the conjecture applies to <em>any</em> sum of consecutive odd numbers.
Timmy's sum of 5+7+9 is incorrect; it is 3·7 = 21. But, Timmy has the right idea. The sum of an arbitrary set of consecutive odd numbers will be the difference of two squares, but not necessarily a perfect square.
3m+21=6m
=>21=6m-3m
=>21=3m
=>7=m
Therefore option A is the answer
Answer:
49
Step-by-step explanation:
100- 51 = 49
6b - 8 = 8b - 11
11 - 8 = 8b - 6b
3 = 2b
b = 3/2 = 1.5
