That looks great! But say you chose number 2. You could say you organized it by multiplying single packs by the pieces of packs.
Answer:
See explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Plot the solution sets to both inequalities.
1. For the inequality 
First, plot the dotted line 
(dotted because sign is without notion "or equal to"), then choose correct part by substitution coordinates of the origin.
so the origin does not belong to the needed part. Shade the part, which does not include origin.
2. For the inequality 
First, plot the dotted line 
(dotted because sign is without notion "or equal to"), then choose correct part by substitution coordinates of the origin.
so the origin does not belong to the needed part. Shade the part, which does not include origin.
3. Find the common region of these two shaded parts - this is the solution to the system of two inequalities.
Answer:
Yes there is sufficient evidence.
Null hypothesis; H_o ; μ = 445
Alternative hypothesis; H_o ; μ ≠ 445
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis states that there is no difference in the test which is denoted by H_o. However, the sign of null hypothesis is denoted by the signs of = or ≥ or ≤.
Meanwhile, the alternative hypothesis is one that defers from the null hypothesis. This therefore implies a significant difference in the test. Thus, the signs of alternative hypothesis is denoted by; < or > or ≠.
Now, the question we have is a two tailed test. Thus;
The null hypothesis is;
bag filling machine works correctly at the 445 gram setting which is;
H_o ; μ = 445
The alternative hypothesis is;
bag filling machine works incorrectly at the 445 gram setting which is;
H_o ; μ ≠ 445
