In 2013, the Supreme Court made a ruling in the Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin case that the college must show compelling evidence that racial preferences are justified as one of the admissions criteria.
<h3>In Davis v. UT Austin, what decision did the Supreme Court make?</h3>
In Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin (Fisher), the U.S. Supreme Court (the "Court") decided on June 23, 2016, by a vote of 4-3 that the university's race-conscious admissions policy complied with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In its 2013 decision in Davis v. Texas, which remanded the case to the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court set high requirements for affirmative action policies, saying that colleges could only take race into account when making admissions decisions if they could provide a "reasoned, principled explanation" for wanting a diverse student body.
To know more about University of Texas refer to: brainly.com/question/2437326
#SPJ4
The answer is a. Change state boundaries
Answer:
Stimulus hunger
Explanation:
Stimulus hunger: The term stimulus hunger is also denoted as sensation hunger and is defined as the requirement for different sensory input from another person as well as the requirement for the stimulation related to being with another person.
Human beings possess a stimulus hunger i.e, they require sensory and emotional stimulation to be healthy biologically and in the absence of this, they can even face deterioration in the biological and physical health that can often lead to death.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the stimulus hunger.
<span>The answer is: Fruit of the Poisoned Tree.</span>
