Yes because <span>A </span>formal amendment<span> to the USA </span>constitution can<span> only be made by a vote of 2/3 of each house of congress and then by the legislatures of 3/4 of the states, or by a</span>constitutional<span> convention. Once that happens the </span>constitution<span> is changed, and the new provisions are law, just like the rest of the </span>constitution<span>.
i got this from </span>www.quora.com
<span>D. Mount Saint Helens
</span><span>C. pyroclastic flows.
</span>
NOT:
A. Kilauea
B. Parícutin
<span>C. Himalayas
</span>
NOT:
<span>A. melting rocks.
B. rising magma.
D. pyroclastic deposits.</span><span>
</span>
The court chose Worcestor because it was a peaceful tribe
Hello there.
<span>
The Progressive movement was driven by
</span><span>c.
the belief that revolutionary change was imminent and should be embraced.</span>
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>The courts have played an important role in adjudicating racial categorization processes. Understanding court decisions around racial categorization processes further underscores how race and ethnicity are </em><u><em>Social and historical constructs.</em></u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Social construct can be defined as the process of giving the idea about something to an individual by the society. Race is an example of social construct. Race is <em>categorized in different ways </em>based on outlook like skin color, size of eye, accent, and physical features.
The study of <em>history of different races and study</em> of the reasons behind the behavioral approach of certain tribe might be an historical construct. Historical construct may be used to increase the <em>satisfaction to the people of certain race. </em>
