Genitals and leaves out psychological issues
<span>Tefer believes it leaves out important aspects, focusing too much on genital functioning and leaving out the psychological aspect
Basson agrees and feels that women's motivations for sex are more complex than men; driven by desire for intimacy
Tiefer and Basson believe nonsexual distractions of life interfere with a woman's ability to be sexually aroused</span>
Answer:
<h3>Debate over representation when creating the constitution.</h3>
Explanation:
When the Constitution was being revised during the Convention of Philadelphia, 1787, the main debate that occurred was on the issue of representation. The larger states favored representation according to the size and population of the states while the smaller states demanded for equal representation of states regardless of size and population.
This debate led to the outcome of two agreements among the delegates. Firstly, there would be two national houses of legislature in the Congress - The House of the Representatives and The Senate respectively. Secondly, the number of representatives on the House of Representatives would be proportionate to the size and population of each state while the number of representatives in the Senate would be equal for every state.
The issue was solved through a resolution called the Great Compromise.
No not all of it some people still agreed but then again I am not sure.
:)
I REALLY HOPE I HELPED
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
