Answer: B
Explanation: an isosceles triangle has 2 sides that are the same, so if the base angles are both 34° then you can multiply that by 2 to get 68°. After that you know that you're still missing one of the angles so that missing angle is x. The equation you can set up to solve for x is the following: 68° + x° = 180°
Hope this helped! :)
Answer:
x > -5
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: 1/5 or 8 houses. Company X provides electricity to 8 houses, Company Y provides to 24 houses, so that would mean Company Z provides 8
Answer:
Y = 90
X = 52
Step-by-step explanation:
Y is on a straight line. The sum of the angles on a straight line is 180.
The only other angle (that is marked) on this straight line, is a 90 degree one. So, <y + 90 = 180.
<y = 90.
Now <x + 38 = 90
so, x = 52
Answer:
a
The estimate is 
b
Method B this is because the faulty breaks are less
Step-by-step explanation:
The number of microchips broken in method A is 
The number of faulty breaks of method A is 
The number of microchips broken in method B is 
The number of faulty breaks of method A is 
The proportion of the faulty breaks to the total breaks in method A is


The proportion of the faulty to the total breaks in method B is

For this estimation the standard error is

substituting values


The z-values of confidence coefficient of 0.95 from the z-table is

The difference between proportions of improperly broken microchips for the two breaking methods is mathematically represented as
![K = [p_1 - p_2 ] \pm z_{0.95} * SE](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K%20%3D%20%5Bp_1%20-%20p_2%20%5D%20%5Cpm%20z_%7B0.95%7D%20%2A%20SE)
substituting values
![K = [0.08 - 0.07 ] \pm 1.96 *0.0186](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K%20%3D%20%5B0.08%20-%200.07%20%5D%20%5Cpm%201.96%20%2A0.0186)

The interval of the difference between proportions of improperly broken microchips for the two breaking methods is
