Answer:
7 to 3 is this answer
Step-by-step explanation:
if you noticed, with all the other ones they all have 3 : 7 in it. So by the process of elimination it's 7 to 3 that is different. I'll tell you why,
3 : 7, that is the ratio we have as an example. That's why it isn't the different one.
3 to 7, you say 3 : 7 as 3 to 7 to it still has the same ratio
3/7, this is how to type the fraction version of the ratio so it makes sense that it is the same one as 3 : 7.
7 to 3, if you haven't noticed yet, all of them has 3 : 7 as a counterpart. They are all the same but this one, this is 7 : 3 or 7 to 3. So with logic, this is the different ratio.
Answer:
is there a picture to this problem?
Answer:
3
Step-by-step explanation:
(f O g) this basically means that the input x first goes trough the function g and then f. Like f(g(x)).
So when x went trough g, you got the output g(x) and then this went trough f and you got f(g(x)) = -8 = 'f(x)'.
With this in mind you can retrace your steps by first looking at what input can get -8 as an output, for f this is -4. this means g(x) = -4
Then you look at what input (this is the x you're looking for) gets you the ouput -4. Looking at the second image you'll picture see that it's the input 3.
1 is 52 2 is 30 3 is 30 4 is 62 5 is 118
Since a rhomubs is a 4 sided quadrilateral when parallel lines intersect within we solve for the triangles that are the result of the intersecting lines m<2=10, m<3=10
