Yes, It is possible for the opportunity cost of an input to be very low or zero if there is no alternative use for it. It means that the statement is true.
The opportunity cost of an input is zero if it has no alternative use. This is so because the cost of alternatives refers to the value of the next best option. Since there isn't an alternative available in the scenario described, the opportunity cost is zero.
The opportunity cost of a certain activity option is defined as the loss of value or benefit that would result from engaging in that activity (the cost) as opposed to engaging in an alternative activity that offers a higher return in value or benefit in microeconomic theory.
To learn more about opportunity cost here
brainly.com/question/24319061
#SPJ4
Answer:
Participation enhances project effectiveness through community ownership of development efforts and aids decision-making
Explanation:
Basically, a man named Francisco was on the expedition that founded a city named San Sebastian
Answer:
About 700 ce a new cultural complex arose in the Mississippi valley between the present-day... Researchers studying the pre-Columbian copper work from the Cahokia Mounds, southwestern Illinois, U.S. The site was the primary centre of the Middle Mississippian culture.
pls give brainlyest if u want
According to Adam Smith, the self-interest represents the personal gain of the individual and actions he takes in order accomplish that self interest. He was a staunch believer in the free market and was against government regulations because he thought that the free market would most benefit the individual and therefore the society. The competition is what makes the the manufacturers produce better products and more of them, while this will spur the costumers to buy those products. When many act in their own self interest, the market will give both to the manufacturers and the consumers.
