Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "sit-in".
Explanation:
- The Warren Court greatly extended civil rights or liberties, judiciary as well as federal authority, it backed sit-in, finding that slaves who attempted to leave a separate lunch counter should never be taken to court.
- The Court adopted the per individual concept, a single vote, which indicated that legislatures needed to always be re-assigned based on population.
I think the raw materials is sunlight,water, and dirt.
Answer:
The correct answer is D. Judges in a common law system have the power to interpret the common law so that it applies to the unique circumstances of an individual case.
Explanation:
The common law system is based, above all, on the analysis of judicial sentences handed down by the same court or one of its higher courts (those to which decisions made by said court can be appealed) and on the interpretations that in these sentences are given from the laws. This is why the laws can be ambiguous in many respects, as the courts are expected to clarify them (or they have already done so on previous, but similar, laws).
On the other hand, there are judicial interpretations that create new legal figures, which in the beginning was the norm, but today is the exception. However, the nomenclature that recognizes as a statutory offense, for example, the offense created by law, is maintained. At present, it is much more common for laws to create completely new figures or to standardize and set the rules previously established by court sentences.
A very important detail is that, in subsequent cases, the sufficient reason of the sentences previously handed down obliges a court (and all courts below this) to fail to the same way or similarly. This is why the study of the system is based on the detailed analysis of the sentences from which the norm is induced, a study that ends in the elaboration of a "typical case", which is compared with the situation under study to see if it is similar or not. On many occasions, several sentences containing the same principle, viewed from different perspectives, are analyzed to finally extract the rule that will be applied to the case under study.
Artifacts are things that were made by our ancestors they are important BC without them you will never have stuff like wheels ,cars and stuff like that
<u>Answer:
</u>
Yes, the students should be able to criticize their school in the school newspaper to an agreeable extent.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- To allow the students to bring into practice the education that they are given about the Constitution and the rights granted by the Constitution, they should be given the opportunity to exercise their rights at the school level itself.
- These rights should also include the right to free speech. The students should be allowed to freely put up their thoughts about the school's functioning and its management.
- At the same time, students should not be allowed to speak about the mandatory things done by the management for the good of the students.
