Answer:
Rs 75,000
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the total value of property be x
If one-fifth of that is given to son
property with son = 1/5 of total value of property = 1/5 of x = x/5
If one-third of that is given to daughter
property with daughter = 1/3 of total value of property = 1/3 of x = x/3
remaining property after giving the portions to son and daughter
= total value of property - property with son -property with daughter
= x - x/5 - x/3
taking LCM of 5 and 3 (15)
= (15x - 3x - 5x)/15
= 7x/15
Given that remaining property was given to wife
property with wife = 7x/15
it is given that wife got 35000 Rs
thus,
7x/15 = 35,000
7x = 35,000*15 = 525,000
x = 525,000/7 = 75,000
Thus, total worth of property =Rs 75,000 Answer
Step-by-step explanation:
yes, if your teacher meant to include the default factors of every positive integer number : 1 and the number itself.
these are the 2 positive integer factors.
if a positive number can only be divided without remainder by 1 or by itself (with result 1), then it is per definition a prime number.
if the number can be divided without remainder by another number, then we are not dealing with a prime number.
but if your teacher did not have these default factors in mind, then no :
example : 15
15 has only 2 factors : 3 and 5.
both are positive integer numbers.
and yet 15 is not a prime number.
but back to my first point, 15 also has formally the factors 1 and 15. so, if we count them too, then we have suddenly 4 factors. and the original statement fits again.
We can break it into two parts.
-> First, the rectangle on the bottom is made up of 2 feet x 16 feet. The formula for area of a rectangle is length times width, so in this case it is equal to 32 feet
-> Next, the triangle has sides of 10 feet, 10 feet, and 16 feet. We can calculate that the height is 6. The formula for area of a triangle is base times height divided by two, so, 
48 feet
-> Last, we can add the two totals together. 32 feet + 48 feet = 80 feet giving us our final answer of 80 feet². As this answer is not pictured I am going to assume they are not including Heron's formula or other more complex formulas, leading us to the answer of "can't be determined"
Answer:
O can't be determined
Have a nice day! - <em>Note: It depends on the level of your math class for whether the answer "cannot be determined" is correct as it can be determined, just takes more effort than simple one - two-step formulas.</em>
I hope this is what you are looking for, but if not - comment! I will edit and update my answer accordingly. (ノ^∇^)
★ Also please leave the rating you think I deserve (It helps other users as well as myself)
- Heather
I think it would be the first one and the last one
If the rule for this pattern is add 3, you would take term 1 which had 5 dots then add 3, that makes term 2 have 8 dots, than add 3 that means term 3 has 11 dots, term four would have 14, and each term after that would have 3 more
