Answer: Legal- rational Leadership style
Explanation:
The rational-legal style also known as transactional leadership is when a leader exercises control and authority on the basis of his knowledge to his subordinates.
Transactional leader is someone who values order and structure based on rules and regulations to complete task on time. Transactional leaders do not encourage personal creativity and innovative ideas because They depend on people who work well in a structured, directed environment ruled by influence and control.
Their main focus is on RESULTS, conformity to the existing structure of an organization and measures success based on the organization’s system of rewards and penalties. This type of leader is responsible for maintaining routine by managing and monitoring individual and group performance.
This type of leader sets the criteria for their workers according to existing defined requirements. Performance reviews are the most common way to judge employee performance.
Transactional leaders differ from other leaders like the charismatic and transformational leaders in that it is only results oriented.
In a nut shell, the legal rational Leadership style focuses on the give and take style based on controlling the performance of the individual and determining how well he or she can deliver in a structured environment.
We can then infer that the boss follows the legal-rational leadership style.
Answer: Social democratic is used for center-left political parties, "whose aim is the gradual amelioration of poverty and exploitation within a liberal capitalist society." On the other hand, democratic socialist is used for left-wing socialist parties, including left-wing populist parties such as The Left, Podemos and Syriza.
Explanation: Hopefully this helps u I don't know if this is the right answer
Answer:
This term we will be considering the rise of the individual. It is argued that processes of modernity have atomised societies and given rise to the dawn of individualism. As the concept of community increasingly crumbles in the modern imagination the significance of the self is heightened.
A concurrent power is a power shared by the state and by the federal government. An example of such power is taxation and borrowing money.
