Answer:Yes yes it can
Explanation:Why ? Because Stony Brook University in New York found that CFL bulbs produce incredibly high levels of UVA and UVC emissions, which are harmful to human skin.
Answer:
Binomial Nomenclature is a two-term naming system that uses two different terms to name the species, plants, animals and living organisms. ... The two terms consist of a generic epithet which is genus (category) of that species, and specific epithet which indicates the species itself.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is: Ka= 5.0 x 10⁻⁶
Explanation:
The ionization of a weak monoprotic acid HA is given by the following equilibrium: HA ⇄ H⁺ + A⁻. At the beginning (t= 0) we have 0.200 M of HA. Then, a certain amount (x) is dissociated into H⁺ and A⁻, as is detailed in the following table:
HA ⇄ H⁺ + A⁻
t= 0 0.200 M 0 0
t -x x x
t= eq 0.200M -x x x
At equilibrium, we have the following ionization constant expression (Ka):
Ka= ![\frac{ [H^{+}] [A^{-} ]}{ [HA]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B%20%5BH%5E%7B%2B%7D%5D%20%20%5BA%5E%7B-%7D%20%5D%7D%7B%20%5BHA%5D%7D)
Ka= 
Ka= 
From the definition of pH, we know that:
pH= - log [H⁺]
In this case, [H⁺]= x, so:
pH= -log x
3.0= -log x
⇒x = 10⁻³
We introduce the value of x (10⁻³) in the previous expression and then we can calculate the ionization constant Ka as follows:
Ka= 
= 
= 5.025 x 10⁻⁶= 5.0 x 10⁻⁶
When equilibrium has been reached so, according to this formula we can get the specific heat of the unknown metal and from it, we can define the metal as each metal has its specific heat:
Mw*Cw*ΔTw = Mm*Cm*ΔTm
when
Mw → mass of water
Cw → specific heat of water
ΔTw → difference in temperature for water
Mm→ mass of metal
Cw→ specific heat of the metal
ΔTm → difference in temperature for metal
by substitution:
100g * 4.18 * (40-39.8) = 8.23 g * Cm * (50-40)
∴ Cm = 83.6 / 82.3 = 1.02 J/g.°C
when the Cm of the Magnesium ∴ the unknown metal is Mg
The first reason to repeat experiments is simply to verify results. Different science disciplines have different criteria for determining what good results are. Biological assays, for example must be done in at least triplicate to generate acceptable data. Science is built on the assumption that published experimental protocols are repeatable.
2) The next reason to repeat experiments is to develop skills necessary to extend established methods and develop new experiments. “Practice make perfect” is true for the concert hall and the chemical laboratory.
3) Refining experimental observations is another reason to repeat. Maybe you did not follow the progress of the reaction like you should have.
4) Another reason to repeat experiments is to study and/or improve them in way. In the synthetic chemistry laboratory, for example, there is always a desire to improve the yield of a synthetic step. Will certain changes in the experimental conditions lead to a better yield? The only way to find out is to try it! The scientific method informs us that it is best to only make one change at a time.
5) The final reason to repeat an extraction, chromatographic or synthetic protocol is to produce more of your target substance. This is sometimes referred to scale-up.
