I would have to say the answer is C. There were no slaves, Chicago's climate can get cold, and they are all cities (not a lot of farmland), but they are all on waterways.
Answer:
<em>Comparative politics is investigating internal processes within countries or political entities by comparing their characteristics according to a specific model.</em> Though it can potentially address a wide range of aspects, comparative politics is most widely applied to such <em>issues </em>as <u>politics of democratic and authoritarian states</u>, <u>political identit</u>y, <u>regime change</u> and <u>democratization</u>, <u>voting behavior</u> and a number of others.
<em>Comparativists often ask</em> how certain processes, for example, democratization, differ in specific states that still can be placed under the same analysis because they share certain characteristics.
Following the <u>democratization example</u>, let us take post-soviet countries. Comparativists may take most similar countries that share many similarities, such as Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), or most different countries, such as Estonia and Belarus. Here comparativists may ask, why Estonia developed a strong democratic regime, while Belarus fell into a consolidated authoritarian regime.
Answer:
While the world is being feed and have something to drink Africa looks like he hasn’t had anything in food or water.???
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is a) utilitarian approach.
Explanation:
The utilitarian approach seeks to achieve the greatest benefit for the largest amount of people, even if it involves sacrificing other resources.
A famous thought experiment demonstrates the utilitarian perspective: a trolley is running through the tracks and you notice it will run over <u>five people</u>. There is a lever which you can pull to change the trolley's direction, but there is <u>one person</u> on this other side. The utilitarian approach would chose to pull the lever.
