Answer:
Foot-in-the-door technique.
Explanation:
The foot-in-the-door technique is a compliance tactic that involves getting a person to agree to a modest request so that, in the long game, they agree to a large request. In this case, the approach in the example is a Foot-in-the-door technique given that they first made a small request (wear a button) so that, after some weeks of wearing that, they accept the large request (adopt a dog).
Answer: he was assassinated
Explanation:
Answer:
As a result of the Fredonian Revolt, the Mexican government began to pay closer attention to the activities of the Texas colonies (which were predominantly made up of Anglo settlers). The Mexican government, in an effort to regain control of the area, began to impose more rules and regulations on the settlers. This concerned the Anglo settlers because up until now they had pretty much been left alone to live and govern as they pleased. They were worried the Mexican government would place more limits on their rights and freedom.
Answer:
They moved to the cities to work in factories, leading to the urbanization of the national economy.
Explanation:
The British Agricultural Revolution took place between the seventeenth to the nineteenth century in Britain. It was a revolution which led to an enormous increase in the production of agricultural products. This was the result of the increase in the land and the labor supply. The countryside was vacated and the industrial production was multiplied. The peasants lost their land that got concentrated in the hands of few. They had no other option than to force themselves to work in the industries. This led to an increase in urbanization.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Congressman has to respond to the Big Pizza Lobby taking these considerations in mind.
Congressman has to realize the impact of the presence of this big "company" in the market. Not only for other industries that cannot compete with this huge company but the impact it has on consumers.
The congressman would propose the kind of bill that benefits free trade, competence, and benefits consumers in a free market.
The big company is not going to stay "arms-folded." The company is going to hire lobbyists to negotiate with congressmen in order to promote its particular agendas and personal interests.
Of course, the big company wants to change the rules against it, and modify them to facilitate their interests. The negotiations can make legislators doubt or rethink a regulation. That is when Congressman has to think to support the interests of citizens, who were the ones who took him/her to office in the elections. So congressmen serve the people, not large companies.
