Answer:
This differs from non-rigid motion, like a dilation, where the size of the object can increase or decrease. When working with rigid motion, you will typically see two objects that show the transformation.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
See below
Step-by-step explanation:
I think we had a question similar to this before. Again, let's figure out the vertical and horizontal distances figured out. The distance from C at x=8 to D at x=-5 is 13 units while the distance from C at y=-2 to D at y=9 is 11 units. (8+5=13 and 2+9=11, even though some numbers are negative, we're looking at their value in those calculations)
Next, we have to divide each distance by 4 so we can apply it to the ratio. 13/4=
and 11/4=
. Next, we need to read the question carefully. It's asking us to place the point in the ratio <em>3</em> to <em>1</em> from <em>C</em> to <em>D</em>. The point has to be closer to endpoint D because of this. Let's take each of our fractions, multiply them by 3, then add them towards the direction of endpoint D to get our answer (sorry if that sounds confusing):

Therefore, our point that partitions CD into a 3:1 ratio is (
).
I'm not sure if there was more to #5 judging by how part B was cut off. From what I can understand of part B, however, I believe that Beatriz started from endpoint D and moved towards C, the wrong direction. She found the coordinates for a 1:3 ratio point.
Also, for #6, since a square is a 2-dimensional object, the answer needs to be written showing that. The answer for #6 is 9 units^2.
use unitary method
for 5 it costs 330p
so for 1 choc it will cost 330/5
to get 9,
(330/5) =66
66 multiplied by 9 =594
therefore 9 will cost 594p
The expression to solve is the
300-7 [4 (3+5)] + 3 to the 3rd power
3 to the third power means 3³, so
300-7 [4(3+5)]+3³
= 300 - 7 [4(8)] + 27
= 300 - 7[32] + 27
= 300 - 224 + 27
= 76 + 27
= 103
so, by solving this we get 103