Answer:
2, 4, and 5 refers to scientific revolution while on the other hand, the remaining statements shows scientific observation.
Explanation:
Cloning has the potential to significantly benefit a great many people, so it should not be considered immoral or risky is refers as scientific observation.
A scientist thinks that he might find serious inconsistencies in the fossil record if he conducts an excavation in a new location is refers scientific explanation because explanation is needed for it.
The rocks present in western Africa and eastern South America formed at the same place and at the same time is scientific observation because the scientists takes the data.
Even if modern organisms are found in ancient portions of the fossil record, this wouldn't challenge the theory of evolution in any way is refers to scientific explanation.
The cloning of organisms is an exciting area of study, and more resources should be be devoted to it so it is refers as scientific explanation.
The age, type, and composition of ancient rocks in western Africa are nearly identical to the age, type, and composition of rocks in eastern South America is scientific observation which is taken by the scientist through research.
<span>the high amplitude of the waves at origination. the deeper the water the faster the tsunamis wave, the more damage</span>
1 is nucleic acids and 2 is nucleic acids
Answer:
a) the same number of cells in both
Explanation:
In cells reproduction, in both cases we consider the same specie, the same generation time, and we assume the same broth.
The only advantage of the container with more milliliters of nutrients is that when the population increases, it will need more nutrients, so maybe the reproduction rate in the container with 100 ml will be lower.
But if the temperature, the quantity of nutrients are the same in both containers, so the volume is not a variable to affect the speed or low the reproduction rate.