Answer: At the age of 65 the money will be $90337.5
Explanation: There are 365 days in a year take $5 multiply it by 365 to get the money after one year then multiply it by 10 % to get an interest per year. Add the interest to the amount then multiply by 43 years.
Note 65years-22 years = 43 years
$5×365= $1825
$1825×10%=$182.5
=$182.5+$1825=$2007.5/year
$2007.5×43= $90337.5
Answer:
14.925%
Explanation:
Cost of equity = Unlevered Cost of Equity + (Unlevered Cost of Equity - Cost of debt)*Debt to value ratio / (1-debt to value ratio)*(1-Tax rate)
Cost of equity = 12% + (12%-9%)*0.6/(1 - 0.6)*(1 - 35%)
Cost of equity = 0.12 + 0.018/0.4*0.65
Cost of equity = 0.12 + 0.02925
Cost of equity = 0.14925
Cost of equity = 14.925%
So, Alabaster's cost of equity will be 14.925%.
Answer:
1 Boost your credit history and score
2 Internet purchases
3 Emergency money
4 Rewards
5 History of purchases
6 No fear of loss or theft
7 Interest free money
8 Merchant protection
9 Insurance on purchases
10 Convenient when traveling
Answer:
A. Stockholders equity at the end is $493,000.
B. Closing total assets is $865,000.
C. Closing liability is $410,000.
Explanation:
A. Closing total assets:
= Opening assets + increase in assets
= $845,000 + $177,000
= $1,022,000
Closing liability:
= Opening liability - Decrease in liability
= $600,000 - $71,000
= $529,000
Closing equity:
= Closing assets - Closing liability
= $1,022,000 - $529,000
= $493,000
B. Opening equity:
= Opening assets - Opening liability
= $845,000 - $600,000
= $245,000
Closing assets:
= Opening assets + increase in liability - Decrease in equity
= $845,000 + $92,000 - $72,000
= $865,000
C. Closing liability:
= Opening liability - decrease in assets - increase in equity
= $600,000 - $90,000 - $100,000
= $410,000
Answer:
quasi-strict scrutiny approach
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the approach most likely to be adopted for this case is quasi-strict scrutiny approach. This refers to a statutory classification that deals with gender or legitimacy. Which is exactly what this is case is in regards to, as they are filling a suit on the basis that they are being treated differently based on their gender.