False, The whole point of G-20 is to set policies that are effective
Answer:
The strategy that would be least effective in reducing the company's criminal liability is:
D. It could donate to the election campaigns of the new members of Congress to establish goodwill.
Explanation:
While the other three options will effectively reduce the company's criminal liability exposure, option D is the least that is likely to have a positive or effective effect. This implies that option D is most likely to aggravate the criminal liability of the company as it will be regarded as bribery to cover up a crime.
The number of burritos that will be supplied depends on the costs the supplier incurs.
You did not include any charts that can be used to answer this specific question so I will give a general answer.
When a supplier is deciding the price at which to supply a good, they look at:
- Their costs both fixed and variable
- The price others are charging
- The demand for the good
The most important factor is their costs. If in this case, it costs more than $1 to produce a burrito, they will not supply burritos. If their costs are less than a dollar, the number of burritos supplied will then depend on other factors but they will supply some.
In conclusion, if the cost to make the burrito is less than $1, the supplier will supply no burritos but if the cost is less, they will supply based on other factors.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/1908405.</em>
Yes. Collective bargaining is negotiation of wages working conditions by an organized group of employees (often called a union). The union representatives meet with the employer/employer's representatives to negotiate terms.
